Generation-skipping Transfer Tax - The Version of The Tax Starting in 1986

The Version of The Tax Starting in 1986

That approach posed so many administrative problems that in 1986 Congress repealed the 1976 version and enacted a new generation-skipping transfer tax law.

The most recent version of the generation-skipping tax, applicable to estate or gift transfers through December 31, 2009, did not attempt to impose a tax equal to the estate or gift tax that was avoided. Instead, the generation-skipping tax was imposed at a flat rate equal to the highest marginal estate and gift bracket applicable at the time of the gift, bequest, transfer or termination. In 2009, that rate was currently 45%.

In 2009, each taxpayer currently possessed a $3,500,000 exemption from the generation-skipping tax. That meant that only aggregate gifts and bequests to grandchildren or younger beneficiaries in excess of $3,500,000 (potentially $7,000,000 for a married couple acting in concert) would be subject to the generation-skipping transfer tax.

In 2010, like the Federal Estate Tax, the generation-skipping transfer tax was repealed. In some ways, it could be viewed that the exemption is essentially unlimited in 2010 for transfers that would otherwise be subject to the tax. However, the law that created the increases and ultimate repeal of the GST Tax Exemption, expired on December 31, 2010.

For generation-skipping trusts created in the years of 2011 and 2012 and for outright gifts to skip-persons, taxpayers are entitled to a $5 million GST tax exemption.

Read more about this topic:  Generation-skipping Transfer Tax

Famous quotes containing the words version, tax and/or starting:

    Remember that you were a slave in the land of Egypt, and the LORD your God brought you out from there with a mighty hand and an outstretched arm; therefore the LORD your God commanded you to keep the sabbath day.
    Bible: Hebrew, Deuteronomy 5:15.

    See Exodus 22:8 for a different version of this fourth commandment.

    Change of fashion is the tax levied by the industry of the poor on the vanity of the rich.
    —Sébastien-Roch Nicolas De Chamfort (1741–1794)

    He was at a starting point which makes many a man’s career a fine subject for betting, if there were any gentlemen given to that amusement who could appreciate the complicated probabilities of an arduous purpose, with all the possible thwartings and furtherings of circumstance, all the niceties of inward balance, by which a man swings and makes his point or else is carried headlong.
    George Eliot [Mary Ann (or Marian)