Issue
| Name | Birth | Death | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stillborn Daughter | 1 October 1794 | 1 October 1794 | stillborn |
| Frederick William IV of Prussia | 15 October 1795 | 2 January 1861 | married Elisabeth Ludovika of Bavaria (1801–1873), no issue. |
| Wilhelm I of Prussia | 22 March 1797 | 9 March 1888 | married Augusta of Saxe-Weimar-Eisenach (1811–1890), had issue. |
| Princess Charlotte of Prussia | 13 July 1798 | 1 November 1860 | married Nicholas I of Russia (1796–1855), had issue. |
| Princess Frederica of Prussia | 14 October 1799 | 30 March 1800 | died in childhood |
| Prince Charles of Prussia | 29 July 1801 | 21 January 1883 | married Princess Marie of Saxe-Weimar-Eisenach (1808–1877), had issue. |
| Princess Alexandrine of Prussia | 23 February 1803 | 21 April 1892 | married Paul Friedrich, Grand Duke of Mecklenburg-Schwerin (1800–1842), had issue. |
| Prince Ferdinand of Prussia | 13 December 1804 | 1 April 1806 | died in childhood |
| Princess Louise of Prussia | 1 February 1808 | 6 December 1870 | married Prince Frederik of the Netherlands (1797–1881), had issue. |
| Prince Albert (Albrecht) of Prussia | 4 October 1809 | 14 October 1872 | married Princess Marianne of the Netherlands (1810–1883), had issue; married second to Rosalie von Rauch (1820–1879), Countess of Hohenau, had issue. |
Read more about this topic: Frederick William III Of Prussia
Famous quotes containing the word issue:
“If the issue doesn’t matter a whole lot, just drop it. You don’t have to win every fight ... and you will not have lost any of your authority by giving in when it doesn’t matter very much.”
—Lawrence Balter (20th century)
“Parents are led to believe that they must be consistent, that is, always respond to the same issue the same way. Consistency is good up to a point but your child also needs to understand context and subtlety . . . much of adult life is governed by context: what is appropriate in one setting is not appropriate in another; the way something is said may be more important than what is said. . . .”
—Stanley I. Greenspan (20th century)
“Take away from the courts, if it could be taken away, the power to issue injunctions in labor disputes, and it would create a privileged class among the laborers and save the lawless among their number from a most needful remedy available to all men for the protection of their business interests against unlawful invasion.... The secondary boycott is an instrument of tyranny, and ought not to be made legitimate.”
—William Howard Taft (1857–1930)