Fractional Fourier Transform - Definition

Definition

If the continuous Fourier transform of a function is denoted by, then, and in general ; similarly, denotes the n-th power of the inverse transform of . The FRFT further extends this definition to handle non-integer powers for any real, denoted by and having the properties:

when is an integer, and:

More specifically, is given by the equation:

\mathcal{F}_\alpha(f)(\omega) = \sqrt{\frac{1-i\cot(\alpha)}{2\pi}} e^{i \cot(\alpha) \omega^2/2} \int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-i\csc(\alpha) \omega t + i \cot(\alpha) t^2/2} f(t)\, dt.

Note that, for, this becomes precisely the definition of the continuous Fourier transform, and for it is the definition of the inverse continuous Fourier transform.

If is an integer multiple of, then the cotangent and cosecant functions above diverge. However, this can be handled by taking the limit, and leads to a Dirac delta function in the integrand. More easily, since, must be simply or for an even or odd multiple of, respectively.

Read more about this topic:  Fractional Fourier Transform

Famous quotes containing the word definition:

    “I’m beginning to think that the proper definition of “Man” is “an animal that writes letters.””
    —Lewis Carroll [Charles Lutwidge Dodgson] (1832–1898)

    “Mothers often are too easily intimidated by their children’s negative reactions...When the child cries or is unhappy, the mother reads this as meaning that she is a failure. This is why it is so important for a mother to know...that the process of growing up involves by definition things that her child is not going to like. Her job is not to create a bed of roses, but to help him learn how to pick his way through the thorns.”
    —Elaine Heffner (20th century)

    “Beauty, like all other qualities presented to human experience, is relative; and the definition of it becomes unmeaning and useless in proportion to its abstractness. To define beauty not in the most abstract, but in the most concrete terms possible, not to find a universal formula for it, but the formula which expresses most adequately this or that special manifestation of it, is the aim of the true student of aesthetics.”
    —Walter Pater (1839–1894)