Figure-eight Knot (mathematics) - Description

Description

A simple parametric representation of the figure-eight knot is as the set of all points (x,y,z) where

\begin{align} x & = \left(2 + \cos{(2t)} \right) \cos{(3t)} \\ y & = \left(2 + \cos{(2t)} \right) \sin{(3t)} \\ z & = \sin{(4t)} \end{align}

for t varying over the real numbers (see 2D visual realization at bottom right).

The figure-eight knot is prime, alternating, rational with an associated value of 5/2, and is achiral. The figure-eight knot is also a fibered knot. This follows from other, less simple (but very interesting) representations of the knot:

(1) It is a homogeneous closed braid (namely, the closure of the 3-string braid σ1σ2-1σ1σ2-1), and a theorem of John Stallings shows that any closed homogeneous braid is fibered.

(2) It is the link at (0,0,0,0) of an isolated critical point of a real-polynomial map F: R4→R2, so (according to a theorem of John Milnor) the Milnor map of F is actually a fibration. Bernard Perron found the first such F for this knot, namely,

where

\begin{align} G(x,y,z,t)=\ & (z(x^2+y^2+z^2+t^2)+x (6x^2-2y^2-2z^2-2t^2), \\ & \ t x \sqrt{2}+y (6x^2-2y^2-2z^2-2t^2)). \end{align}

Read more about this topic:  Figure-eight Knot (mathematics)

Famous quotes containing the word description:

    “The type of fig leaf which each culture employs to cover its social taboos offers a twofold description of its morality. It reveals that certain unacknowledged behavior exists and it suggests the form that such behavior takes.”
    —Freda Adler (b. 1934)

    “The great object in life is Sensation—to feel that we exist, even though in pain; it is this “craving void” which drives us to gaming, to battle, to travel, to intemperate but keenly felt pursuits of every description whose principal attraction is the agitation inseparable from their accomplishment.”
    —George Gordon Noel Byron (1788–1824)

    “Why does philosophy use concepts and why does faith use symbols if both try to express the same ultimate? The answer, of course, is that the relation to the ultimate is not the same in each case. The philosophical relation is in principle a detached description of the basic structure in which the ultimate manifests itself. The relation of faith is in principle an involved expression of concern about the meaning of the ultimate for the faithful.”
    —Paul Tillich (1886–1965)