Proof
Immerman 1999 provides a detailed proof of the theorem. Essentially, we use second-order existential quantifiers to arbitrarily choose a computation tableau. For every timestep, we arbitrarily choose the finite state control's state, the contents of every tape cell, and which nondeterministic choice we must make. Verifying that each timestep follows from each previous timestep can then be done with a first-order formula.
A key idea from the proof is that we can encode a linear order of length nk as a 2k-ary relation R on a universe A of size n. To achieve this, we choose a linear ordering L of A and then define R to be the lexicographical ordering of k-tuples from A with respect to L.
Read more about this topic: Fagin's Theorem
Famous quotes containing the word proof:
“There is no better proof of a man’s being truly good than his desiring to be constantly under the observation of good men.”
—François, Duc De La Rochefoucauld (1613–1680)
“If some books are deemed most baneful and their sale forbid, how, then, with deadlier facts, not dreams of doting men? Those whom books will hurt will not be proof against events. Events, not books, should be forbid.”
—Herman Melville (1819–1891)
“The thing with Catholicism, the same as all religions, is that it teaches what should be, which seems rather incorrect. This is “what should be.” Now, if you’re taught to live up to a “what should be” that never existed—only an occult superstition, no proof of this “should be”Mthen you can sit on a jury and indict easily, you can cast the first stone, you can burn Adolf Eichmann, like that!”
—Lenny Bruce (1925–1966)