Factorial - Rate of Growth and Approximations For Large N

Rate of Growth and Approximations For Large N

As n grows, the factorial n! increases faster than all polynomials and exponential functions (but slower than double exponential functions) in n.

Most approximations for n! are based on approximating its natural logarithm

The graph of the function f(n) = log n! is shown in the figure on the right. It looks approximately linear for all reasonable values of n, but this intuition is false. We get one of the simplest approximations for log n! by bounding the sum with an integral from above and below as follows:

which gives us the estimate

Hence log n! is Θ(n log n) (see Big O notation). This result plays a key role in the analysis of the computational complexity of sorting algorithms (see comparison sort). From the bounds on log n! deduced above we get that

It is sometimes practical to use weaker but simpler estimates. Using the above formula it is easily shown that for all n we have, and for all n ≥ 6 we have .

For large n we get a better estimate for the number n! using Stirling's approximation:

In fact, it can be proved that for all n we have

A much better approximation for log n! was given by Srinivasa Ramanujan (Ramanujan 1988)

\log n! \approx n\log n - n + \frac {\log(n(1+4n(1+2n)))} {6} + \frac {\log(\pi)} {2}
= n\log n - n + \frac {\log(1 +1/(2n) +1/(8n^2))} {6} + \frac {3\log (2n)} 6 + \frac {\log(\pi)} {2},

thus it is even better than the next correction term of Stirling's formula.

Read more about this topic:  Factorial

Famous quotes containing the words rate of, rate, growth and/or large:

    At this very moment,... the most frightful horrors are taking place in every corner of the world. People are being crushed, slashed, disembowelled, mangled; their dead bodies rot and their eyes decay with the rest. Screams of pain and fear go pulsing through the air at the rate of eleven hundred feet per second. After travelling for three seconds they are perfectly inaudible. These are distressing facts; but do we enjoy life any the less because of them? Most certainly we do not.
    Aldous Huxley (1894–1963)

    If you could choose your parents,... we would rather have a mother who felt a sense of guilt—at any rate who felt responsible, and felt that if things went wrong it was probably her fault—we’d rather have that than a mother who immediately turned to an outside thing to explain everything, and said it was due to the thunderstorm last night or some quite outside phenomenon and didn’t take responsibility for anything.
    D.W. Winnicott (20th century)

    Sensuality often accelerates the growth of love so much that its roots remain weak and are easily pulled up.
    Friedrich Nietzsche (1844–1900)

    We live under continual threat of two equally fearful, but seemingly opposed, destinies: unremitting banality and inconceivable terror. It is fantasy, served out in large rations by the popular arts, which allows most people to cope with these twin specters.
    Susan Sontag (b. 1933)