Ring Structure and Module Structure On Specific Exts
One more very useful way to view the Ext functor is this: when an element of Extn
R(A, B) = 0 is considered as an equivalence class of maps f: Pn → B for a projective resolution P* of A ; so, then we can pick a long exact sequence Q* ending with B and lift the map f using the projectivity of the modules Pm to a chain map f*: P* → Q* of degree -n. It turns out that homotopy classes of such chain maps correspond precisely to the equivalence classes in the definition of Ext above.
Under sufficiently nice circumstances, such as when the ring R is a group ring over a field k, or an augmented k-algebra, we can impose a ring structure on Ext*
R(k, k). The multiplication has quite a few equivalent interpretations, corresponding to different interpretations of the elements of Ext*
R(k, k).
One interpretation is in terms of these homotopy classes of chain maps. Then the product of two elements is represented by the composition of the corresponding representatives. We can choose a single resolution of k, and do all the calculations inside HomR(P*,P*), which is a differential graded algebra, with cohomology precisely ExtR(k,k).
The Ext groups can also be interpreted in terms of exact sequences; this has the advantage that it does not rely on the existence of projective or injective modules. Then we take the viewpoint above that an element of Extn
R(A, B) is a class, under a certain equivalence relation, of exact sequences of length n + 2 starting with B and ending with A. This can then be spliced with an element in Extm
R(C, A), by replacing ... → X1 → A → 0 and 0 → A → Yn → ... with:
where the middle arrow is the composition of the functions X1 → A and A → Yn. This product is called the Yoneda splice.
These viewpoints turn out to be equivalent whenever both make sense.
Using similar interpretations, we find that Ext*
R(k, M) is a module over Ext*
R(k, k), again for sufficiently nice situations.
Read more about this topic: Ext Functor
Famous quotes containing the words ring, structure and/or specific:
“Generally, about all perception, we can say that a sense is what has the power of receiving into itself the sensible forms of things without the matter, in the way in which a piece of wax takes on the impress of a signet ring without the iron or gold.”
—Aristotle (384–323 B.C.)
“If rightly made, a boat would be a sort of amphibious animal, a creature of two elements, related by one half its structure to some swift and shapely fish, and by the other to some strong-winged and graceful bird.”
—Henry David Thoreau (1817–1862)
“The permanence of all books is fixed by no effort friendly or hostile, but by their own specific gravity, or the intrinsic importance of their contents to the constant mind of man.”
—Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803–1882)