Disjunction Property Implies Existence Property
In 1974 Harvey Friedman proved that in any recursively enumerable extension of intuitionistic arithmetic, the converse of the above also holds. Throughout the following discussion assume is such an extension of arithmetic. Harvey Friedman's proof is quite intricate, making of self-referential sentences in a similar way to the one used in the proof of the incompleteness theorem. They key step is to find a bound on the existential quantifier because bounded existential formula can be written as a disjunction,
- .
However, given an arbitrary existential formula, can we hope to replace it by a bounded one?
Read more about this topic: Disjunction And Existence Properties
Famous quotes containing the words property, implies and/or existence:
“Those whom the gods chose as their property must not consort with mortals.”
—Franz Grillparzer (1791–1872)
“I’m a priest, not a priestess.... “Priestess” implies mumbo jumbo and all sorts of pagan goings-on. Those who oppose us would love to call us priestesses. They can call us all the names in the world—it’s better than being invisible.”
—Carter Heyward (b. 1946)
“We need not only a purpose in life to give meaning to our existence but also something to give meaning to our suffering. We need as much something to suffer for as something to live for.”
—Eric Hoffer (1902–1983)