Results
Only one election was held in the seat, in 1994. When nominations closed, it was revealed that Richard Huggett was a candidate with the description "Literal Democrat", a name very similar to that of the Liberal Democrats. They launched legal action in the High Court of Justice alleging that the Returning Officer had wrongly accepted a nomination which was designed to confuse voters. The Judge ruled that the nomination had to stand. He won more than 10,000 votes, while Liberal Democrat candidate Adrian Sanders finished only 700 votes behind the winner. This prompted a change in the law, banning potentially confusing party descriptions.
| European Parliament election, 1994: Devon and East Plymouth | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
| Conservative | Giles Chichester | 74,953 | 31.7 | N/A | |
| Liberal Democrat | Adrian Sanders | 74,253 | 31.4 | N/A | |
| Labour | Linda Gilroy | 47,596 | 20.1 | N/A | |
| Liberal | David Morrish | 14,621 | 6.2 | N/A | |
| Green | P. A. Edwards | 11,172 | 4.7 | N/A | |
| Literal Democrat | Richard Huggett | 10,203 | 4.3 | N/A | |
| Independent | J. A. Everard | 2,629 | 1.1 | N/A | |
| Natural Law | A. J. Pringle | 908 | 0.4 | N/A | |
| Majority | 700 | 0.3 | N/A | ||
| Turnout | 45.1 | N/A | |||
| New creation: Conservative gain. | Swing | N/A |
|
||
Read more about this topic: Devon And East Plymouth (European Parliament Constituency)
Famous quotes containing the word results:
“A distinction of property results from that very protection which a free Government gives to unequal faculties of acquiring it.”
—James Madison (17511836)
“The study and knowledge of the universe would somehow be lame and defective were no practical results to follow.”
—Marcus Tullius Cicero (10643 B.C.)
“There is not a single rule, however plausible, and however firmly grounded in epistemology, that is not violated at some time or other. It becomes evident that such violations are not accidental events, they are not results of insufficient knowledge or of inattention which might have been avoided. On the contrary, we see that they are necessary for progress.”
—Paul Feyerabend (19241994)