Exclusion Based On Class
The country club was originally designed in the 1880’s as a social meeting place, albeit one of an exclusive nature. The clubhouse in particular was a place for men of a homogenous background and of similar socioeconomic class to meet in a social setting. This essentially drew people together from a similar sociological niche under the pretenses of sport. The country club continues to reinforce exclusive identities and maintain a homogenous culture through membership fees and limited invitations for potential members.
Membership is exclusive and limited to individuals belonging to a high or middle-class culture and was once described as being “solely composed of landowners and business owners.” Indirectly, country clubs restrict membership to social elites by increasing the cost of entrance and annual fees. Essentially, membership requires a disposable income, thereby making it inaccessible to the working class. If the cost of membership is not enough to deter blue-collar workers, the exorbitant cost of belonging and fitting in with country club culture certainly is. Country club’s are a form of social capital; they advance members’ social status, resulting in economic benefits through the value of social networks. Therefore, individuals require pre-existing social capital to become members. Country clubs create avenues for conspicuous consumption in order to demonstrate social status and differentiation. In other words, they enable individuals to showcase personal wealth and status through consumption, and therefore promote consumption. Country clubs pressure individuals to spend on travel, equipment, drinks, and uniforms, all in the hopes of portraying a high-class identity and lifestyle. This exclusionary technique has been fundamental to the country club since its origins and is still practiced today. The Brookstone Country Club demands a $15,000 initiation fee from all new members while the Indian Creek Country Club in Florida demands a $60,000 initiation fee in addition to an $8,000 annual rate.
Originally, country clubs had the power to directly exclude individuals by controlling who was allowed to apply for membership and who gained acceptance. The majority of golf clubs in the USA predating 1914 instilled a system in which existing club members had to nominate a potential applicant before they could undergo an election by the committee. The committee would then determine if the applicant was suitable for membership. Therefore, invitations were limited to those who had pre-existing social ties with club members; preventing diversity. This application process resulted not only in class exclusion, but also in racial, ethnic and gender segregation.
Today, the application process to become a member is unique and individualistic to the club, although social capital is still a prerequisite. However, exclusion still exists and judgments’ of applicants are encouraged. Segregation by class and income is the most common form of exclusion based on the financial requirements for membership, however insuring that new members “fit in” can result in racial and gender discrimination.
Read more about this topic: Country Club
Famous quotes containing the words exclusion, based and/or class:
“We belong to the community. It is not the tailor alone who is the ninth part of a man; it is as much the preacher, and the merchant, and the farmer. Where is this division of labor to end? and what object does it finally serve? No doubt another may also think for me; but it is not therefore desirable that he should do so to the exclusion of my thinking for myself.”
—Henry David Thoreau (1817–1862)
“Justice in the hands of the powerful is merely a governing system like any other. Why call it justice? Let us rather call it injustice, but of a sly effective order, based entirely on cruel knowledge of the resistance of the weak, their capacity for pain, humiliation and misery. Injustice sustained at the exact degree of necessary tension to turn the cogs of the huge machine-for- the-making-of-rich-men, without bursting the boiler.”
—Georges Bernanos (1888–1948)
“Why, since man and woman were created for each other, had He made their desires so dissimilar? Why should one class of women be able to dwell in luxurious seclusion from the trials of life, while another class performed their loathsome tasks? Surely His wisdom had not decreed that one set of women should live in degradation and in the end should perish that others might live in security, preserve their frappeed chastity, and in the end be saved.”
—Madeleine [Blair], U.S. prostitute and “madam.” Madeleine, ch. 10 (1919)