Cosmic Censorship Hypothesis - Weak and Strong Cosmic Censorship Hypothesis

Weak and Strong Cosmic Censorship Hypothesis

The weak and the strong cosmic censorship hypothesis are two conjectures concerned with the global geometry of spacetimes.

  • The weak cosmic censorship hypothesis asserts there can be no singularity visible from future null infinity. In other words, singularities need to be hidden from an observer at infinity by the event horizon of a black hole.

Mathematically, the conjecture states that, for generic initial data, the maximal Cauchy development possesses a complete future null infinity.

  • The strong cosmic censorship hypothesis asserts that, generically, general relativity is a deterministic theory, in the same sense that classical mechanics is a deterministic theory. In other words, the classical fate of all observers should be predictable from the initial data. Mathematically, the conjecture states that the maximal Cauchy development of generic compact or asymptotically flat initial data is locally inextendible as a regular Lorentzian manifold.

The two conjectures are mathematically independent, as there exist spacetimes for which the weak cosmic censorship is valid but the strong cosmic censorship is violated and, conversely, there exist spacetimes for which the weak cosmic censorship is violated but the strong cosmic censorship is valid.

Read more about this topic:  Cosmic Censorship Hypothesis

Famous quotes containing the words weak, strong, cosmic, censorship and/or hypothesis:

    But sure there is need of other remedies than dreaming, a weak contention of art against nature.
    Michel de Montaigne (1533–1592)

    The love of the famous, like all strong passions, is quite abstract. Its intensity can be measured mathematically, and it is independent of persons.
    Susan Sontag (b. 1933)

    For morality life is a war, and the service of the highest is a sort of cosmic patriotism which also calls for volunteers.
    William James (1842–1910)

    The censorship method ... is that of handing the job over to some frail and erring mortal man, and making him omnipotent on the assumption that his official status will make him infallible and omniscient.
    George Bernard Shaw (1856–1950)

    On pragmatistic principles, if the hypothesis of God works satisfactorily in the widest sense of the word, it is true.
    William James (1842–1910)