Composition For Four Instruments - Structure and Analysis

Structure and Analysis

Composition for Four Instruments is scored for flute, clarinet, violin, and cello. An immediate division is apparent between the two wind instruments and the two strings. In addition to this, Babbitt makes use of every possible subset of the ensemble group within the different sections of the piece. He uses every combination of instruments only once, saving the full ensemble for the conclusion. The piece can be broken up into fifteen sections according to the subset of instruments playing: four solos, four trios, six duos, one tutti (Taruskin 2009, 144). The instrumental subsets are arranged in complementary pairs, so that each instrument plays only once in every pair of sections. The four solos occur with decreasing frequency (at intervals of five, four, and three sections), "converging", so to speak, on the final quartet, which is just two sections after the violin solo (Dubiel 1992, 84).

Composition for Four Instruments (instrumental list)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Fl. Fl. Fl. Fl. Fl. Fl. Fl. Fl.
Cl. Cl. Cl. Cl. Cl. Cl. Cl. Cl.
Vn. Vn. Vn. Vn. Vn. Vn. Vn. Vn.
Vc. Vc. Vc. Vc. Vc. Vc. Vc. Vc.

The twelve-tone row upon which the entire composition is based is given by the composer as 0 4 1 3 11 2 : 8 5 9 7 10 6, and is generated by the first trichord of the piece (Babbitt 1976, 12). It never once appears complete as a melodic succession, however (Dubiel 1990, 222), though several authors (Perle 1981, Cone 1967, Arnold and Hair 1976) have given different conflicting versions of a row claimed to be "made explicit only in the final section". While the set given by Babbitt concatenates the first trichords of all four instruments in the order of their entrances at the very beginning of the work, Perle's "basic set" from the end of the composition can be transformed into the composer's version "by wholesale inversion plus individual retrogression of the trichords" (Dubiel 1990, 252–53). The pitch array used in the first 35 bars of the piece is as follows (Dubiel 1990, 223):

Composition for Four Instruments (Initial pitch array)
G♭ A F G♯ E G, C♯ B♭ D B D♯ C; G E G♯ F A F♯, C D♯ B D B♭ C♯.
D♭ B♭ D B E♭ C, F♯ A F G♯ E G; C E♭ B D B♭ C♯, G E G♯ F A F♯.
B E♭ C C♯ B♭ D, G♯ E G F♯ A F; D B♭ C♯ C E♭ B, F A F♯ G E A♭.
A♭ E G F♯ A F, B D♯ C C♯ B♭ D; F A F♯ G E A♭, D B♭ D♭ C E♭ B.

The first section of the piece begins with a solo in the clarinet, using the (014) trichord or its retrograde. The notes of this solo are separated by register into four distinct voices, though the notes of any one trichord are usually interrupted by notes from other trichords in other registers, making it hard to hear these structures individually (Howland 2010, 40). Babbitt presents several instances of tone rows in the opening bars of the piece. A note-by-note analysis of the first nine measures reveals two such tone rows, the first beginning at measure one and the second at measure seven. A closer look at the separation of the opening into the four registers reveals two additional tone rows. The set of notes contained in the two high registers form a tone row, as do the notes in the lower two registers.

The piece begins with a three-note motive, or trichord (a collection of three distinct pitch classes), in the next-to-lowest register: B–E♭–C, with a succession of +4 then –3 semitone intervals. The following measures present three transformations of this opening trichord, in retrograde-inversion, retrograde, and inverse forms (D♭–B♭–D, G♭–A–F, and A♭–E–G, respectively) separated into the mid-high, high, and lowest registers, respectively (therefore with interval patterns of –3 +4, –4 + 3, and –4 +3). However, these three trichords overlap in time, so that the temporal order of the nine notes is D♭–G♭–A♭–E–B♭–A–G–D–F. In this way, the twelve-tone aggregate is compositionally ordered into a chromatic, thematic surface, with the properties of another ordered set underneath it (Babbitt 1987, 28). The clarinet solo continues by adding more forms of the basic trichord until a complete twelve-tone aggregate is unfolded in each register (Swift 1976, 239).

As a result, seeking for "the row" caused "even the friendliest people" to become baffled and resentful, because of a fundamental misunderstanding about Babbitt's approach to his material:

That's not the way I conceive of a set. This is not a matter of finding the lost set. This is not a matter of cryptoanalysis (where's the hidden set?). What I'm interested in is the effect it might have, the way it might assert itself not necessarily explicitly. (Babbitt 1987, 27

The entire opening clarinet solo can be analyzed as an array of these trichords—an "array"" being two or more simultaneous sets presented in such a way that the sums of their horizontal segments form columnar twelve-tone aggregates (Mead 1983, 90)—and their various inversions and retrogrades. The trichordal relationships between the notes in the four registers of the clarinet foreshadow the interaction between the four instrument voices in the conclusion of the piece. Also, the way in which the instruments unfold throughout the piece directly corresponds to the progression of the trichords in the clarinet solo. The organization of the pitch classes throughout the piece is consistently and undeniably self-referential (Babbitt 1987, 27).

In addition to his use of multi-dimensional tone rows, Babbitt also serialized rhythmic patterns. He uses the duration row as his primary rhythmic structure in Composition for Four Instruments, each of which consist of four different durations. The durations can be represented by the sequence of numbers 1 4 3 2: the second note is four times the duration of the first, etc. The duration of the initial note changes every phrase, varying the durations throughout the piece (Sitsky 2002, 18). For example, the first four notes of the opening clarinet solo follow the 1 4 3 2 duration pattern. This rhythmic pattern is then manipulated under the same transformations as the pitches in a tone row. These transformations include the retrograde (2 3 4 1), the inversion (4 1 2 3) and the retrograde inversion (3 2 1 4). Babbitt expands this idea in later pieces, for example working instead with a set of twelve unique durational units in Composition for Twelve Instruments.

As he does in the pitch domain, Babbitt achieves additional variety in the rhythmic patterns of Composition for Four Instruments by manipulating the duration row and its three variations in different ways. At times, he expands the row by multiplying each duration in the pattern by the four other members. Applying this transformation to the original row 1 4 3 2 results in the duration rows 1 4 3 2, 4 16 12 8, 3 12 9 6, and 2 8 6 4. Following the same procedure with the multipliers for the retrograde, 2 3 4 1, yields 4 6 8 2, 6 9 12 3, 8 12 16 4, 2 3 4 1. The inversion of the multipliers is 4 1 2 3, and the retrograde inversion is 3 2 1 4, producing 16 4 8 12, 4 1 2 3, 8 2 4 6, 12 3 6 9, and 9 6 3 12, 6 4 2 8, 3 2 1 4, 12 8 4 16, respectively (Pearsall 1997, 217). In the final three bars of the piece, the clarinet plays the retrograde of the opening duration row with each element multiplied by 4, giving the pattern 8 12 16 4.

A third domain in which Babbitt applies serial technique is that of dynamic changes. He uses dynamic contours as another type of row, which can be manipulated as effectively as pitch and rhythm. For example, starting in measure 22, the dynamic markings read ff > mf p > ppp ff mf. The following pattern is then found at measure 24: ppp p < ff mf ppp p. A graphical representation of the contour of these two dynamic patterns reveals that the second is a transposed inversion of the first.

Composition for Four Instruments holds a significant position as one of the early serial compositions, which draws from and reinvents techniques introduced in the work of Arnold Schoenberg and Anton Webern. Babbitt continued to explore serialism throughout his career.

Read more about this topic:  Composition For Four Instruments

Famous quotes containing the words structure and, structure and/or analysis:

    Each structure and institution here was so primitive that you could at once refer it to its source; but our buildings commonly suggest neither their origin nor their purpose.
    Henry David Thoreau (1817–1862)

    For the structure that we raise,
    Time is with materials filled;
    Our to-days and yesterdays
    Are the blocks with which we build.
    Henry Wadsworth Longfellow (1809–1882)

    Ask anyone committed to Marxist analysis how many angels on the head of a pin, and you will be asked in return to never mind the angels, tell me who controls the production of pins.
    Joan Didion (b. 1934)