Differentiation From Other Major Legal Systems
It should be noted that it has been said that little is known of continental European civil law systems from a comparative law perspective. The table below contains essential disparities (and in some cases similarities) between the world's four major legal systems.
| Common law | Civil law | Socialist law | Islamic law | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other names | Anglo-American, English, judge-made, legislation from the bench | Continental, Romano-Germanic | Social | Religious law, Sharia |
| Source of law | Case law, statutes/legislation | Statutes/legislation | Statutes/legislation | Religious documents, case law |
| Lawyers | Control courtroom | Judges dominate trials | Judges dominate trials | Secondary role |
| Judges' qualifications | Experienced lawyers (appointed or elected) | Career judges | Career bureaucrats, Party members | Religious as well as legal training |
| Degree of judicial independence | High | High; separate from the executive and the legislative branches of government | Very limited | Ranges from very limited to high |
| Juries | Provided at trial level | May adjudicate in conjunction with judges in serious criminal matters | Often used at lowest level | Allowed in Maliki school, not allowed in other schools |
| Policy-making role | Courts share in balancing power | Courts have equal but separate power | Courts are subordinate to the legislature | Courts and other government branches are theoretically subordinate to the Shari'a. In practice, courts historically made the Shari'a, while today, the religious courts are generally subordinate to the executive. |
| Examples | Australia, UK (except Scotland), India (except Goa), Ireland, Singapore, Hong Kong, USA (except Louisiana), Canada (except Quebec), Pakistan, Malaysia, Bangladesh, Norway (to some extent) | All European Union states except UK and Ireland; Brazil, China (except Hong Kong), Japan, Mexico, Russia, Switzerland, Turkey, Quebec, Louisiana, Goa | Soviet Union and other communist regimes | Many Muslim countries have adopted parts of Sharia Law. Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan, Iran, UAE, Oman, Sudan, Yemen |
Civil law is primarily contrasted with common law, which is the legal system developed first in England, and later among English-speaking peoples of the world. Despite their differences, the two systems are quite similar from a historical point of view. Both evolved in much the same way, though at different paces. The Roman law underlying civil law developed mainly from customary law that was refined with caselaw and legislation. Canon law further refined court procedure. Similarly, English law developed from Norman and Anglo-Saxon customary law, further refined by caselaw and legislation. The differences of course being that (1) Roman law had crystallised many of its principles and mechanisms in the form of the Justinian Code, which drew from caselaw, scholarly commentary, and senatorial statutes; and (2) civilian caselaw has persuasive authority, not binding authority as under common law.
Codification, however, is by no means a defining characteristic of a civil law system. For example, the statutes that govern the civil law systems of Sweden and other Nordic countries or Roman-Dutch countries are not grouped into larger, expansive codes like those found in France and Germany.
Read more about this topic: Civil Law (legal System)
Famous quotes containing the words major, legal and/or systems:
“True spoiling is nothing to do with what a child owns or with amount of attention he gets. he can have the major part of your income, living space and attention and not be spoiled, or he can have very little and be spoiled. It is not what he gets that is at issue. It is how and why he gets it. Spoiling is to do with the family balance of power.”
—Penelope Leach (20th century)
“I have spent all my life under a Communist regime, and I will tell you that a society without any objective legal scale is a terrible one indeed. But a society with no other scale but the legal one is not quite worthy of man either.”
—Alexander Solzhenitsyn (b. 1918)
“What is most original in a man’s nature is often that which is most desperate. Thus new systems are forced on the world by men who simply cannot bear the pain of living with what is. Creators care nothing for their systems except that they be unique. If Hitler had been born in Nazi Germany he wouldn’t have been content to enjoy the atmosphere.”
—Leonard Cohen (b. 1934)