Existence of Bump Functions
It is possible to construct bump functions "to specifications". Stated formally, if is an arbitrary compact set in n dimensions and is an open set containing there exists a bump function which is 1 on and 0 outside of Since can be taken to be a very small neighborhood of this amounts to being able to construct a function that is 1 on and falls off rapidly to 0 outside of while still being smooth.
The construction proceeds as follows. One considers a compact neighborhood of contained in so The characteristic function of will be equal to 1 on and outside of so in particular, it will be 1 on and outside of This function is not smooth however. The key idea is to smooth a bit, by taking the convolution of with a mollifier. The latter is just a bump function with a very small support and whose integral is 1. Such a mollifier can be obtained, for example, by taking the bump function from the previous section and performing appropriate scalings.
Read more about this topic: Bump Function
Famous quotes containing the words existence of, existence, bump and/or functions:
“‘Tis going, I own, like the Knight of the Woeful Countenance, in quest of melancholy adventures—but I know not how it is, but I am never so perfectly conscious of the existence of a soul within me, as when I am entangled in them.”
—Laurence Sterne (1713–1768)
“We know then the existence and nature of the finite, because we also are finite and have extension. We know the existence of the infinite and are ignorant of its nature, because it has extension like us, but not limits like us. But we know neither the existence nor the nature of God, because he has neither extension nor limits.”
—Blaise Pascal (1623–1662)
“I have always thought the suicide shd/ bump off at least one swine before taking off for parts unknown.”
—Ezra Pound (1885–1972)
“Let us stop being afraid. Of our own thoughts, our own minds. Of madness, our own or others’. Stop being afraid of the mind itself, its astonishing functions and fandangos, its complications and simplifications, the wonderful operation of its machinery—more wonderful because it is not machinery at all or predictable.”
—Kate Millett (b. 1934)