Sociological Issues of Boarding Schools
Some elite University-preparatory boarding schools for pupils from age 14 to 18 are seen by sociologists as centers of socialization for the next generation of political upper class and reproduces elite class system. This attracts families who value power and hierarchy for socialization of their family members. These families share a sense of entitlement to social class or hierarchy and power. Boarding schools are seen by certain families as centres of socialization where pupils mingle with others of similar social hierarchy to form what is called as Old boy network. Elite boarding school pupils are brought up with the assumption that they are meant to control society. Significant number of them enter political upper class of society or join financial elite in fields such as international banking and venture capital. Elite boarding school socialization instil students to internalize a strong sense of entitlement and social control or hierarchy. This form of socialization is called as “deep structure socialization” by Peter Cookson & Caroline Hodges (1985). This refers to the way in which boarding schools not only manage to control the pupils physical lives but also their emotional lives. Boarding school establishment involves controlling of behaviour regarding several aspects of life including what is appropriate and or acceptable which adolescents would consider as intrusive. This boarding school socialization is carried over well after leaving school and into their dealings with the social world. Thus it develops boarding school students to adhere to values of elite social class from which they come from or to which they aspire to be part of. According to Peter W Cookson Jr (2009) the elitist tradition of elite preparatory boarding schools has declined due to the development of modern economy and the political rise of the liberal west coast of the United States of America.
Read more about this topic: Boarding School
Famous quotes containing the words sociological, issues and/or schools:
“The primary function of myth is to validate an existing social order. Myth enshrines conservative social values, raising tradition on a pedestal. It expresses and confirms, rather than explains or questions, the sources of cultural attitudes and values.... Because myth anchors the present in the past it is a sociological charter for a future society which is an exact replica of the present one.”
—Ann Oakley (b. 1944)
“The “universal moments” of child rearing are in fact nothing less than a confrontation with the most basic problems of living in society: a facing through one’s children of all the conflicts inherent in human relationships, a clarification of issues that were unresolved in one’s own growing up. The experience of child rearing not only can strengthen one as an individual but also presents the opportunity to shape human relationships of the future.”
—Elaine Heffner (20th century)
“In schools all over the world, little boys learn that their country is the greatest in the world, and the highest honor that could befall them would be to defend it heroically someday. The fact that empathy has traditionally been conditioned out of boys facilitates their obedience to leaders who order them to kill strangers.”
—Myriam Miedzian, U.S. author. Boys Will Be Boys, ch. 3 (1991)