Algorithmic Inference - The General Inversion Problem Solving The Fisher Question

The General Inversion Problem Solving The Fisher Question

With insufficiently large samples, the approach: fixed sample – random properties suggests inference procedures in three steps:

1. Sampling mechanism. It consists of a pair, where the seed Z is a random variable without unknown parameters, while the explaining function is a function mapping from samples of Z to samples of the random variable X we are interested in. The parameter vector is a specification of the random parameter . Its components are the parameters of the X distribution law. The Integral Transform Theorem ensures the existence of such a mechanism for each (scalar or vector) X when the seed coincides with the random variable U uniformly distributed in .
Example. For X following a Pareto distribution with parameters a and k, i.e.

a sampling mechanism for X with seed U reads:

or, equivalently,

2. Master equations. The actual connection between the model and the observed data is tossed in terms of a set of relations between statistics on the data and unknown parameters that come as a corollary of the sampling mechanisms. We call these relations master equations. Pivoting around the statistic, the general form of a master equation is:
.

With these relations we may inspect the values of the parameters that could have generated a sample with the observed statistic from a particular setting of the seeds representing the seed of the sample. Hence, to the population of sample seeds corresponds a population of parameters. In order to ensure this population clean properties, it is enough to draw randomly the seed values and involve either sufficient statistics or, simply, well-behaved statistics w.r.t. the parameters, in the master equations.

For example, the statistics and prove to be sufficient for parameters a and k of a Pareto random variable X. Thanks to the (equivalent form of the) sampling mechanism we may read them as

respectively.

3. Parameter population. Having fixed a set of master equations, you may map sample seeds into parameters either numerically through a population bootstrap, or analytically through a twisting argument. Hence from a population of seeds you obtain a population of parameters.
Example. From the above master equation we can draw a pair of parameters, compatible with the observed sample by solving the following system of equations:

where and are the observed statistics and a set of uniform seeds. Transferring to the parameters the probability (density) affecting the seeds, you obtain the distribution law of the random parameters A and K compatible with the statistics you have observed.

Compatibility denotes parameters of compatible populations, i.e. of populations that could have generated a sample giving rise to the observed statistics. You may formalize this notion as follows:

Read more about this topic:  Algorithmic Inference

Famous quotes containing the words general, problem, solving, fisher and/or question:

    The general public is easy. You don’t have to answer to anyone; and as long as you follow the rules of your profession, you needn’t worry about the consequences. But the problem with the powerful and rich is that when they are sick, they really want their doctors to cure them.
    Molière [Jean Baptiste Poquelin] (1622–1673)

    We have heard all of our lives how, after the Civil War was over, the South went back to straighten itself out and make a living again. It was for many years a voiceless part of the government. The balance of power moved away from it—to the north and the east. The problems of the north and the east became the big problem of the country and nobody paid much attention to the economic unbalance the South had left as its only choice.
    Lyndon Baines Johnson (1908–1973)

    Will women find themselves in the same position they have always been? Or do we see liberation as solving the conditions of women in our society?... If we continue to shy away from this problem we will not be able to solve it after independence. But if we can say that our first priority is the emancipation of women, we will become free as members of an oppressed community.
    Ruth Mompati (b. 1925)

    I turn over a new leaf every day. But the blots show through.
    Keith Waterhouse, British screenwriter, Willis Hall, and John Schlesinger. Billy Fisher (Tom Courtenay)

    O.J. Berman: Well, answer the question now. Is she or isn’t she?
    Paul: Is she or isn’t she what?
    O.J. Berman: A phony.
    Paul. I don’t know. I don’t think so.
    O.J. Berman: You don’t think so, huh? Well, you’re wrong. She is. But on the other hand, you’re right. Because she’s a real phony.
    George Axelrod (b. 1922)