The Series
As with the three previous NHA-PCHA Cup Final series, the series alternated between the NHL champion and the PCHA champion each year, while the differing rules for the leagues alternated each game. This meant that all of the games for the 1918 championship series were played at Toronto's Arena Gardens.
Two of the major differences between the two leagues' rules proved to be a major factor in the series. The PCHA did not allow forward passing and played with seven players per side; the NHL did not adopt forward passing until the following season, and only played with six players. In every game, the winner was the one playing under its league's rules. The Torontos won Games 1 and 3 with victories of 5–3 and 6–3, and the Millionaires recorded 6–4 and 8–1 wins in Games 2 and 4. Because game five was played under NHL rules, it helped Toronto's Corbett Denneny to score the series winning goal in a 2–1 victory. The Torontos outscored the Millionaires by a combined total of 13–7 in the three games played under NHL rules. Conversely, Vancouver recorded a 14–5 margin in the games under PCHA rules.
Toronto goaltender Hap Holmes recorded a 4.20 goals-against average during the series, while Alf Skinner led Toronto with eight goals. Cyclone Taylor scored nine goals for Vancouver.
| Game-by-Game | Winning Team | Score | Losing Team | Rules Used | Location | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | March 20 | Toronto | 5–3 | Vancouver | NHL | Arena Gardens |
| 2 | March 23 | Vancouver | 6–4 | Toronto | PCHA | |
| 3 | March 26 | Toronto | 6–3 | Vancouver | NHL | |
| 4 | March 28 | Vancouver | 8–1 | Toronto | PCHA | |
| 5 | March 30 | Toronto | 2–1 | Vancouver | NHL | |
| Torontos wins best-of-five series 3 games to 2 | ||||||
Read more about this topic: 1918 Stanley Cup Finals
Famous quotes containing the word series:
“Personality is an unbroken series of successful gestures.”
—F. Scott Fitzgerald (1896–1940)
“If the technology cannot shoulder the entire burden of strategic change, it nevertheless can set into motion a series of dynamics that present an important challenge to imperative control and the industrial division of labor. The more blurred the distinction between what workers know and what managers know, the more fragile and pointless any traditional relationships of domination and subordination between them will become.”
—Shoshana Zuboff (b. 1951)