Criticism
Classification in UDEF is not sometimes hampered by ad-hoc decisions that might produce problems. Example:
- b.be.5 is "United-Kingdom Citizen Person" and
- c.be.5 is "European Union Citizen Person"
As the United Kingdom is part of the European Union, the classification is not unique. Response The UDEF is flexible and is designed to match the semantics and behaviour of existing systems. Therefore, if one system has a table for United Kingdom Citizens and a different system has a table for European Union Citizens, the UDEF can handle both situations.
Some of the concepts in UDEF are not as universal as it is claimed. They show a lot of bias to Anglo-American tradition and way of thinking and are not easily transferable to other languages. Example: The following part of the hierarchy shows the concept of an officer.
- j.5 Officer.Person
- a.j.5 Contracting.Officer.Person
- a.a.j.5 Procuring.Contracting.Officer.Person
- a.a.a.j.5 Government.Procuring.Contracting.Officer.Person
- b.a.j.5 Administrative.Contracting.Officer.Person
- b.j.5 Police.Officer.Person
- c.j.5 Military.Officer.Person
In many cultures, the part of the tree below "a.j.5 Contracting Officer Person" would not be placed under j.5 (see officer) as b.j.5 (see Law enforcement officer) or c.j.5 (see Officer (armed forces)).
Read more about this topic: Universal Data Element Framework
Famous quotes containing the word criticism:
“...I wasn’t at all prepared for the avalanche of criticism that overwhelmed me. You would have thought I had murdered someone, and perhaps I had, but only to give her successor a chance to live. It was a very sad business indeed to be made to feel that my success depended solely, or at least in large part, on a head of hair.”
—Mary Pickford (1893–1979)
“To be just, that is to say, to justify its existence, criticism should be partial, passionate and political, that is to say, written from an exclusive point of view, but a point of view that opens up the widest horizons.”
—Charles Baudelaire (1821–1867)
“The visual is sorely undervalued in modern scholarship. Art history has attained only a fraction of the conceptual sophistication of literary criticism.... Drunk with self-love, criticism has hugely overestimated the centrality of language to western culture. It has failed to see the electrifying sign language of images.”
—Camille Paglia (b. 1947)