A **strong Nash equilibrium** is a Nash equilibrium in which no coalition, taking the actions of its complements as given, can cooperatively deviate in a way that benefits all of its members . While the Nash concept of stability defines equilibrium only in terms of unilateral deviations, strong Nash equilibrium allows for deviations by every conceivable coalition. This equilibrium concept is particularly useful in areas such as the study of voting systems, in which there are typically many more players than possible outcomes, and so plain Nash equilibria are far too abundant.

The strong Nash concept is criticized as too "strong" in that the environment allows for unlimited private communication. In fact, strong Nash equilibrium has to be Pareto-efficient. As a result of these requirements, Strong Nash rarely exists in games interesting enough to deserve study. Nevertheless, it is possible for there to be multiple strong Nash equilibria. For instance, in Approval voting, there is always a strong Nash equilibrium for any Condorcet winner that exists, but this is only unique (apart from inconsequential changes) when there is a majority Condorcet winner.

A relatively weaker yet refined Nash stability concept is called coalition-proof Nash equilibrium (CPNE) in which the equilibria are immune to multilateral deviations that are self-enforcing. Every correlated strategy supported by iterated strict dominance and on the Pareto frontier is a CPNE. Further, it is possible for a game to have a Nash equilibrium that is resilient against coalitions less than a specified size *k*. CPNE is related to the theory of the core.

Confusingly, the concept of a strong Nash equilibrium is unrelated to that of a weak Nash equilibrium. That is, a Nash equilibrium can be both strong and weak, or neither.

### Other articles related to "nash, nash equilibrium":

... useful in the analysis of many kinds of equilibria, can also be applied to

**Nash**equilibria ... A

**Nash equilibrium**for a mixed strategy game is stable if a small change (specifically, an infinitesimal change) in probabilities for one player leads to a situation where two conditions hold the player who did ... mixed-strategy will return immediately to the

**Nash equilibrium**...

...

**Nash**is a census-designated place in Walsh County in the U.S ... founded in 1890 as a station along the Great Northern Railroad and named for the

**Nash**brothers, pioneer settlers in the area who operated a fruit store in Grafton and started what is now the

**Nash**...

**Nash**was designated as part of the U.S ...

...

**Nash**Rawiller (born 8 December 1974) is a prominent Australian jockey who mainly rides at meetings in Sydney ...

**Nash**has a brother, Brad Rawiller who is also a jockey mainly riding in Victoria ...

... Tyson Scott

**Nash**(born March 11, 1975) is a former ice hockey left winger ...

**Nash**spent his first five seasons in the NHL with the St ... After his playing career,

**Nash**was hired as the Phoenix Coyotes' radio color analyst, where he joined Bob Heethuis, the Coyotes' radio play-by-play announcer, in the broadcast booth of ...

... crash was witnessed by famous American poet Ogden

**Nash**, who wrote of it to his then fiancee Frances (later his wife) ...

**Nash**'s account is found in "Loving Letters from Ogden

**Nash**A Family Album" edited by Linell

**Nash**Smith (

**Nash**'s daughter) ...

### Famous quotes containing the words equilibrium, strong and/or nash:

“When a person hasn’t in him that which is higher and stronger than all external influences, it is enough for him to catch a good cold in order to lose his *equilibrium* and begin to see an owl in every bird, to hear a dog’s bark in every sound.”

—Anton Pavlovich Chekhov (1860–1904)

“Even if fathers are more benignly helpful, and even if they spend time with us teaching us what they know, rarely do they tell us what they feel. They stand apart emotionally: *strong* perhaps, maybe caring in a nonverbal, implicit way; but their internal world remains mysterious, unseen, “What are they really like?” we ask ourselves. “What do they feel about us, about the world, about themselves?””

—Augustus Y. Napier (20th century)

“How easy for those who do not bulge

To not overindulge!”

—Ogden *Nash* (1902–1971)