Statistical Static Timing Analysis - Limits of Conventional STA

Limits of Conventional STA

STA, while very successful, has a number of limitations:

  • Cannot easily handle within-die correlation, especially if spatial correlation is included.
  • Needs many corners to handle all possible cases.
  • If there are significant random variations, then in order to be conservative at all times, it is too pessimistic to result in competitive products.
  • Changes to address various correlation problems, such as CPPR (Common Path Pessimism Removal) make the basic algorithm slower than linear time, or non-incremental, or both.

SSTA attacks these limitations more or less directly. First, SSTA uses sensitivities to find correlations among delays. Then it uses these correlations when computing how to add statistical distributions of delays.

Interestingly, there is no technical reason why determistic STA could not be enhanced to handle correlation and sensitivities, by keeping a vector of sensitivities with each value as SSTA does. Historically, this seemed like a big burden to add to STA, whereas it was clear it was needed for SSTA, so no-one complained. See some of the criticism of SSTA below where this alternative is proposed.

Read more about this topic:  Statistical Static Timing Analysis

Famous quotes containing the words limits of, limits and/or conventional:

    The limits of prudence: one cannot jump out of a burning building gradually.
    Mason Cooley (b. 1927)

    I shall have the veil withdrawn and be allowed to gaze unblinded on the narrow limits of my own possibilities.
    Beatrice Potter Webb (1858–1943)

    First it must be known that only a spoken word or a conventional sign is an equivocal or univocal term; therefore a mental content or concept is, strictly speaking, neither equivocal nor univocal.
    William of Occam (c. 1285–1349)