Recognition of Same-sex Unions in Italy - Local Civil Union Registries

Local Civil Union Registries

As of 2009, 33 municipalities and cities throughout Italy have introduced civil union registries (registro delle unioni civili) which formally recognise same-sex couples. These registers mostly have a symbolic value and are not legally binding, even though in some cases they offer very limited local benefits. Major cities which offer civil union registries include Bologna, Padua, Florence, Pisa and Bolzano.

Furthermore, several regional governments have introduced symbolic registries for same-sex couples. These include:

Region Date of recognition
Tuscany July 17, 2004
Umbria July 29, 2004
Emilia-Romagna September 14, 2004
Campania September 19, 2004
Marche December 6, 2004
Veneto March 1, 2005
Puglia December 9, 2005
Lazio December 14, 2005
Liguria March 16, 2006
Abruzzo April 20, 2006

In July 2012, Mayor Giuliano Pisapia, promised to introduce a formal register of gay civil unions for the city of Milan (the largest city in Northern Italy), and which would be designed to afford some legal protections to gay couples who cohabit, but these would not be equivalent to marriage rights. A spokesman for the Catholic diocese of Milan responded by arguing there was a "risk that giving equal status to families based on marriage with those founded on civil unions will legitimise polygamy". On July 27, 2012 the Town Council approved the Register of Civil Unions in 29-7 vote.

Read more about this topic:  Recognition Of Same-sex Unions In Italy

Famous quotes containing the words local, civil and/or union:

    Savages cling to a local god of one tribe or town. The broad ethics of Jesus were quickly narrowed to village theologies, which preach an election or favoritism.
    Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803–1882)

    I wish to see, in process of disappearing, that only thing which ever could bring this nation to civil war.
    Abraham Lincoln (1809–1865)

    Let’s have the Union restored as it was, if we can; but if we can’t, I’m in favor of the Union as it wasn’t.
    Artemus Ward (1834–1867)