Fugacity - Definition in Terms of Chemical Potential

Definition in Terms of Chemical Potential

The fugacity of a real gas is formally defined by an equation analogous to the relation between the chemical potential and the pressure of an ideal gas.

In general, the chemical potential (μ) is defined as the partial molar Gibbs free energy. However for any pure substance, it is equal to the molar Gibbs free energy, and its variation with temperature (T) and pressure (P) is given by . At constant temperature, this expression can be integrated as a function of . We must also set a reference state. For an ideal gas the reference state depends only on pressure, and we set = 1 bar so that

Now, for an ideal gas

\mu - \mu ^\circ = \int_{P^\circ }^P {\frac{{RT}} {P}dP} = RT\ln \frac{P} {{P^\circ }}

Reordering, we get

\mu = \mu ^\circ + RT\ln \frac{P} {{P^\circ }}

This gives the chemical potential for an ideal gas in an isothermal process, with a reference state is = 1 bar.

For a real gas, we cannot calculate because we do not have a simple expression for a real gas’ molar volume. Even if using an approximate expression such as the van der Waals equation, the Redlich-Kwong or any other equation of state, it would depend on the substance being studied and would be therefore of very limited utility.

Additionally, chemical potential is not mathematically well behaved. It approaches negative infinity as pressure approaches zero and this creates problems in doing real calculations.

We would like the expression for a real gas’ chemical potential to be similar to the one for an ideal gas. We therefore define a magnitude, called fugacity, so that the chemical potential for a real gas becomes

\mu = \mu ^\circ + RT\ln \frac{f} {{f^\circ }}

with a given reference state to be discussed later. This is the usual form of the definition, but it may be solved for f to obtain the equivalent explicit form

Read more about this topic:  Fugacity

Famous quotes containing the words definition, terms, chemical and/or potential:

    “Beauty, like all other qualities presented to human experience, is relative; and the definition of it becomes unmeaning and useless in proportion to its abstractness. To define beauty not in the most abstract, but in the most concrete terms possible, not to find a universal formula for it, but the formula which expresses most adequately this or that special manifestation of it, is the aim of the true student of aesthetics.”
    —Walter Pater (1839–1894)

    “Theology—An effort to explain the unknowable by putting it into terms of the not worth knowing.”
    —H.L. (Henry Lewis)

    “We are close to dead. There are faces and bodies like gorged maggots on the dance floor, on the highway, in the city, in the stadium; they are a host of chemical machines who swallow the product of chemical factories, aspirin, preservatives, stimulant, relaxant, and breathe out their chemical wastes into a polluted air. The sense of a long last night over civilization is back again.”
    —Norman Mailer (b. 1923)

    “There is a potential 4-6 percentage point net gain for the President [George Bush] by replacing Dan Quayle on the ticket with someone of neutral stature.”
    —Mary Matalin, U.S. Republican political advisor, author, and James Carville b. 1946, U.S. Democratic political advisor, author. All’s Fair: Love, War, and Running for President, p. 205, Random House (1994)