Fugacity - Definition in Terms of Chemical Potential

Definition in Terms of Chemical Potential

The fugacity of a real gas is formally defined by an equation analogous to the relation between the chemical potential and the pressure of an ideal gas.

In general, the chemical potential (μ) is defined as the partial molar Gibbs free energy. However for any pure substance, it is equal to the molar Gibbs free energy, and its variation with temperature (T) and pressure (P) is given by . At constant temperature, this expression can be integrated as a function of . We must also set a reference state. For an ideal gas the reference state depends only on pressure, and we set = 1 bar so that

Now, for an ideal gas

\mu - \mu ^\circ = \int_{P^\circ }^P {\frac{{RT}} {P}dP} = RT\ln \frac{P} {{P^\circ }}

Reordering, we get

\mu = \mu ^\circ + RT\ln \frac{P} {{P^\circ }}

This gives the chemical potential for an ideal gas in an isothermal process, with a reference state is = 1 bar.

For a real gas, we cannot calculate because we do not have a simple expression for a real gas’ molar volume. Even if using an approximate expression such as the van der Waals equation, the Redlich-Kwong or any other equation of state, it would depend on the substance being studied and would be therefore of very limited utility.

Additionally, chemical potential is not mathematically well behaved. It approaches negative infinity as pressure approaches zero and this creates problems in doing real calculations.

We would like the expression for a real gas’ chemical potential to be similar to the one for an ideal gas. We therefore define a magnitude, called fugacity, so that the chemical potential for a real gas becomes

\mu = \mu ^\circ + RT\ln \frac{f} {{f^\circ }}

with a given reference state to be discussed later. This is the usual form of the definition, but it may be solved for f to obtain the equivalent explicit form

Read more about this topic:  Fugacity

Famous quotes containing the words definition in, definition, terms, chemical and/or potential:

    “Was man made stupid to see his own stupidity?
    Is God by definition indifferent, beyond us all?
    Is the eternal truth man’s fighting soul
    Wherein the Beast ravens in its own avidity?”
    —Richard Eberhart (b. 1904)

    “The very definition of the real becomes: that of which it is possible to give an equivalent reproduction.... The real is not only what can be reproduced, but that which is always already reproduced. The hyperreal.”
    —Jean Baudrillard (b. 1929)

    “The nineteenth century was completely lacking in logic, it had cosmic terms and hopes, and aspirations, and discoveries, and ideals but it had no logic.”
    —Gertrude Stein (1874–1946)

    “Ants are so much like human beings as to be an embarrassment. They farm fungi, raise aphids as livestock, launch armies into war, use chemical sprays to alarm and confuse enemies, capture slaves, engage in child labor, exchange information ceaselessly. They do everything but watch television.”
    —Lewis Thomas (b. 1913)

    “There is a potential 4-6 percentage point net gain for the President [George Bush] by replacing Dan Quayle on the ticket with someone of neutral stature.”
    —Mary Matalin, U.S. Republican political advisor, author, and James Carville b. 1946, U.S. Democratic political advisor, author. All’s Fair: Love, War, and Running for President, p. 205, Random House (1994)