Ford Circle - Total Area of Ford Circles

Total Area of Ford Circles

There is a link between the area of Ford circles, Euler's totient function φ, the Riemann zeta function ζ, and Apéry's constant ζ(3).

As no two Ford circles intersect, it follows immediately that the total area of the Ford circles

is less than 1. In fact the total area of these Ford circles is given by a convergent sum, which can be evaluated.

From the definition, the area is

A = \sum_{q\ge 1} \sum_{ (p, q)=1 \atop 1 \le p < q } \pi \left( \frac{1}{2 q^2} \right)^2.

Simplifying this expression gives

A = \frac{\pi}{4} \sum_{q\ge 1} \frac{1}{q^4} \sum_{ (p, q)=1 \atop 1 \le p < q } 1 = \frac{\pi}{4} \sum_{q\ge 1} \frac{\varphi(q)}{q^4} = \frac{\pi}{4} \frac{\zeta(3)}{\zeta(4)},

where the last equality reflects the Dirichlet generating function for Euler's totient function φ(q). Since ζ(4) = π 4/90, this finally becomes

Read more about this topic:  Ford Circle

Famous quotes containing the words total, area, ford and/or circles:

    “Unlike Descartes, we own and use our beliefs of the moment, even in the midst of philosophizing, until by what is vaguely called scientific method we change them here and there for the better. Within our own total evolving doctrine, we can judge truth as earnestly and absolutely as can be, subject to correction, but that goes without saying.”
    —Willard Van Orman Quine (b. 1908)

    “Whatever an artist’s personal feelings are, as soon as an artist fills a certain area on the canvas or circumscribes it, he becomes historical. He acts from or upon other artists.”
    —Willem De Kooning (b. 1904)

    “Can a free people restrain crime without sacrificing fundamental liberties and a heritage of compassion?... Let us show that we can temper together those opposite elements of liberty and restraint into one consistent whole. Let us set an example for the world of a law-abiding America glorying in its freedom as well as its respect for law.”
    —Gerald R. Ford (b. 1913)

    “The whole force of the respectable circles to which I belonged, that respectable circle which knew as I did not the value of security won, the slender chance of replacing it if lost or abandoned, was against me ...”
    —Ida M. Tarbell (1857–1944)