**Consistency**

In logic, a **consistent** theory is one that does not contain a contradiction. The lack of contradiction can be defined in either semantic or syntactic terms. The semantic definition states that a theory is consistent if and only if it has a model, i.e. there exists an interpretation under which all formulas in the theory are true. This is the sense used in traditional Aristotelian logic, although in contemporary mathematical logic the term **satisfiable** is used instead. The syntactic definition states that a theory is consistent if and only if there is no formula *P* such that both *P* and its negation are provable from the axioms of the theory under its associated deductive system.

If these semantic and syntactic definitions are equivalent for a particular logic, the logic is **complete**. The completeness of sentential calculus was proved by Paul Bernays in 1918 and Emil Post in 1921, while the completeness of predicate calculus was proved by Kurt Gödel in 1930, and consistency proofs for arithmetics restricted with respect to the induction axiom schema were proved by Ackermann (1924), von Neumann (1927) and Herbrand (1931). Stronger logics, such as second-order logic, are not complete.

A **consistency proof** is a mathematical proof that a particular theory is consistent. The early development of mathematical proof theory was driven by the desire to provide finitary consistency proofs for all of mathematics as part of Hilbert's program. Hilbert's program was strongly impacted by incompleteness theorems, which showed that sufficiently strong proof theories cannot prove their own consistency (provided that they are in fact consistent).

Although consistency can be proved by means of model theory, it is often done in a purely syntactical way, without any need to reference some model of the logic. The cut-elimination (or equivalently the normalization of the underlying calculus if there is one) implies the consistency of the calculus: since there is obviously no cut-free proof of falsity, there is no contradiction in general.

Read more about Consistency: Consistency and Completeness in Arithmetic and Set Theory, First-order Logic

### Other articles related to "consistency":

**Consistency**

... the levels of consensus, distinctiveness, and

**consistency**in a given situation Low Consensus, Low Distinctiveness, High

**Consistency**= Personal Attribution High Consensus, High Distinctiveness, Low ... they don’t laugh at the next comedian who is on stage (low

**consistency**), and the comedian who John is laughing at always makes his audience members ... hasn’t laughed comedians in the past (low

**consistency**), and he has been laughing at all the comedians performing tonight (high distinctiveness) then the effect is seen as caused by something in the circumstance ...

**Consistency**

... The convention of

**consistency**means that same accounting principles should be used for preparing financial statements for different periods ... The concept of

**consistency**does not mean that no change should be made in accounting procedures ... Whenever,

**consistency**is not followed this fact may be fully disclosed ...

... More specifically, it measures the

**consistency**of the concrete in that specific batch ... This test is performed to check the

**consistency**of freshly made concrete ...

**Consistency**is a term very closely related to workability ...

**Consistency**

...

**Consistency**is the covariation of behavior across time ... If Jane is generous all the time, she shows high

**consistency**... is generous only at specific times, perhaps around the holidays, she shows low

**consistency**...

... Lecky's self-

**consistency**theory, that self-

**consistency**is a primary motivating force in human behavior ... the self and the self's overall need for a "master" motive that serves to maintain for the self a

**consistency**in ideas ... Self-

**consistency**theory remains relevant to contemporary personality and clinical psychologists ...

### Famous quotes containing the word consistency:

“People who love only once in their lives are ... shallow people. What they call their loyalty, and their fidelity, I call either the lethargy of custom or their lack of imagination. Faithfulness is to the emotional life what *consistency* is to the life of the intellect—simply a confession of failures.”

—Oscar Wilde (1854–1900)