Aircraft Type Designation System
In 1962 the Yugoslav Air Force introduced a new aircraft designation system to identify specific aircraft types. Prior to this time, the Air Force had been mainly equipped combat aircraft of US origin, such as the F-84G and T-33A, and the US designation was commonly used. However, aircraft locally modified to fulfill the reconnaissance role, such as the F-86D and T-33A, were referred to as the IF-86D and IT-33A. The selection of the MiG-21, which lacked similar designation, as the new front-line fighter led to the introduction of a formal aircraft designation system.
The main designation consisted of a prefix letter signifying the principal role of the aircraft, and a two-digit individual type number, e.g.: J-22. The role prefixes are:
- L - Lovac (fighter)
- J - Jurisnik (attack)
- H - Helikopter (helicopter)
- V - Visenamjenski (utility)
- N - Nastavni (training)
- T - Transportni (transport)
In addition, various role modification prefix and suffix letters are used, to indicate trainer, reconnaissance etc. variants of the basic design. The role modification letters are:
- I - Izvidjac (reconnaissance)
- M - Modifikovan (modified)
- N - Nastavni (fighter trainer)
- N - Naoruzani (armed helicopter)
- O - Opce namjene (general purpose)
- P - Protivpodmornicki (anti-submarine)
- S - Spailacki (rescue)
- T - Transportni (transport)
| Generic | Variant | Type |
|---|---|---|
| Fighters | ||
| L-10* | Republic F-84G | |
| L-11* | Canadair Sabre | |
| L-12 | Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-21F-13 | |
| NL-12 | Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-21U-400/600 | |
| L-13* | North American F-86D Sabre | |
| L-14 | Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-21PFM | |
| L-14I | Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-21R | |
| NL-14 | Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-21US | |
| L-15 | Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-21M | |
| L-15M | Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-21MF | |
| L-16 | NL-16 | Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-21UM |
| L-17 | Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-21bis | |
| L-17K | Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-21bis-K | |
| L-18 | Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-29 | |
| NL-18 | Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-29UB | |
| Attack | ||
| J-20 | Soko J-20 Kraguj | |
| J-21 | J-1 Jastreb | |
| IJ-21 | Soko RJ-1 Jastreb | |
| NJ-21 | Soko TJ-1 Jastreb | |
| J-22 | J-22 Orao | |
| IJ-22 | Soko RJ-2 Orao | |
| NJ-22 | Soko TJ-2 Orao | |
| INJ-22 | Soko RTJ-2 Orao | |
| Helicopter | ||
| WS 51 | Westland Dragonfly | |
| H-19 | Sikorsky H-19 | |
| H-40 | Mil Mi-8 | |
| HT-40 | Mil Mi-8T | |
| HT-40E | Mil Mi-8 E i PED | |
| H-41 | Mil/PZL Swidnik Mi-2 | |
| HT-41 | Mil/PZL Swidnik Mi-2 | |
| H-42 | Aerospatiale/Soko SA.341H Gazelle | |
| HI-42 | Soko SA.341H HERA | |
| HN-42M | Soko SA.341H GAMA | |
| HO-42 | Aerospatiale/Soko SA.341H Gazelle | |
| HS-42 | Soko SA341H | |
| H-43 | Kamov Ka-25 | |
| HP-43 | Kamov Ka-25Bsh | |
| H-44 | Mil Mi-14 | |
| HP-44 | Mil Mi-14PL | |
| H-45 | Soko SA.342L1 Gazelle | |
| HN-45M | Soko SA.342L1 GAMA 2 | |
| HO-45 | Soko SA.342L1 | |
| H-46 | Kamov Ka-28 | |
| HP-46 | Kamov Ka-28 | |
| Utility | ||
| V-50 | Utva-60H | |
| V-51 | Utva-66 | |
| V-52 | Utva-66H | |
| V-53 | Utva-75 | |
| Training | ||
| N-60 | Soko G-2 Galeb | |
| N-61 | Zlin Z-526 | |
| N-62 | Soko G-4 Super Galeb | |
| N-63 | Utva Lasta | |
| Transport | ||
| T-70 | Antonov An-26 | |
| T-71 | Antonov An-2 | |
Read more about this topic: Yugoslav Air Force
Famous quotes containing the words type, designation and/or system:
“People forget that it is the eye that makes the horizon, and the rounding mind’s eye which makes this or that man a type or representative of humanity with the name of hero or saint.”
—Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803–1882)
“In a period of a people’s life that bears the designation “transitional,” the task of a thinking individual, of a sincere citizen of his country, is to go forward, despite the dirt and difficulty of the path, to go forward without losing from view even for a moment those fundamental ideals on which the entire existence of the society to which he belongs is built.”
—Ivan Sergeevich Turgenev (1818–1883)
“Short of a wholesale reform of college athletics—a complete breakdown of the whole system that is now focused on money and power—the women’s programs are just as doomed as the men’s are to move further and further away from the academic mission of their colleges.... We have to decide if that’s the kind of success for women’s sports that we want.”
—Christine H. B. Grant, U.S. university athletic director. As quoted in the Chronicle of Higher Education, p. A42 (May 12, 1993)