Electoral History
Note: Winners of each election are in bold.
10th British Columbia election, 1903 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | Expenditures | |
Liberal | Alfred Parr 1 | 323 | 40.07% | unknown | ||
Conservative | Harry Wright | 483 | 59.93% | unknown | ||
Total valid votes | 806 | 100.00% | ||||
Total rejected ballots | ||||||
Turnout | % | |||||
1 Parr may have been a Labour candidate although Gosnell labels him a Liberal; he may have campaigned as both. |
11th British Columbia election, 1907 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | Expenditures | |
Independent | John Houston | 147 | 20.68% | unknown | ||
Liberal | John Frederick Hume | 239 | 33.61% | unknown | ||
Conservative | James Hargrave Schofield | 325 | 45.71% | unknown | ||
Total valid votes | 711 | 100.00% | ||||
Total rejected ballots | ||||||
Turnout | % |
12th British Columbia election, 1909 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | Expenditures | |
Socialist | Alexander M. Oliver | 366 | 34.37% | unknown | ||
Conservative | James Hargrave Schofield | 699 | 65.63% | unknown | ||
Total valid votes | 1,065 | 100.00% | ||||
Total rejected ballots | ||||||
Turnout | % |
13th British Columbia election, 1912 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | Expenditures | |
Socialist | Richard Pettipiece Parmenter | 261 | 20.31% | unknown | ||
Conservative | James Hargrave Schofield | 1,024 | 79.69% | unknown | ||
Total valid votes | 1,285 | 100.00% | ||||
Total rejected ballots | ||||||
Turnout | % |
Following the 1912 election most of the area of the Ymir riding was incorporated into the new riding of Nelson.
Read more about this topic: Ymir (electoral District)
Famous quotes containing the words electoral and/or history:
“Nothing is more unreliable than the populace, nothing more obscure than human intentions, nothing more deceptive than the whole electoral system.”
—Marcus Tullius Cicero (10643 B.C.)
“Postmodernism is, almost by definition, a transitional cusp of social, cultural, economic and ideological history when modernisms high-minded principles and preoccupations have ceased to function, but before they have been replaced with a totally new system of values. It represents a moment of suspension before the batteries are recharged for the new millennium, an acknowledgment that preceding the future is a strange and hybrid interregnum that might be called the last gasp of the past.”
—Gilbert Adair, British author, critic. Sunday Times: Books (London, April 21, 1991)