Criticism of Krinsky By Others
The work Meḥōqeqē Yehudā has not been received well. The traditional world seems to have ignored it altogether, whereas the critical world has given it a number of bad reviews. Already in 1907, the year when Krinsky published the first volume, David Hertzog published a harsh review of it in ZDMG. Much later, in 1990, Arye (Leo) Prijs called Krinsky's work misleadingly incomplete; in the preface to his own book on Ibn `Ezra's commentary on the first three chapters of Genesis, Prijs cites a number of quotes from Hertzog's negative review.
It must be remembered that despite the flaws for which Krinsky's work has been criticized, Meḥōqeqē Yehudā remains to this day the only modern complete supercommentary on Ibn `Ezra's Pentateuch commentary. All the other attempts by moderns to produce a supercommentary on Ibn `Ezra's Pentateuch commentary have either been woefully minimal (such as Asher Weiser's annotations to the Mosad Ha-Rav Kook edition of Ibn `Ezra's commentary), or covered only a few chapters of Ibn `Ezra's commentary (such as the works by Prijs and Linetsky, each of which covers only the first few chapters of Genesis.)
Read more about this topic: Yehuda Leib Krinsky
Famous quotes containing the words criticism of and/or criticism:
“Cubism had been an analysis of the object and an attempt to put it before us in its totality; both as analysis and as synthesis, it was a criticism of appearance. Surrealism transmuted the object, and suddenly a canvas became an apparition: a new figuration, a real transfiguration.”
—Octavio Paz (b. 1914)
“A friend of mine spoke of books that are dedicated like this: “To my wife, by whose helpful criticism ...” and so on. He said the dedication should really read: “To my wife. If it had not been for her continual criticism and persistent nagging doubt as to my ability, this book would have appeared in Harper’s instead of The Hardware Age.””
—Brenda Ueland (1891–1985)