Language
Wulfstan was a native speaker of Old English. He was also a competent Latinist. As York was at the centre of a region of England that had for some time been colonized by people of Scandinavian descent, it is possible that Wulfstan was familiar with, or perhaps even bilingual in, Old Norse. He may have helped incorporate Scandinavian vocabulary into Old English. Dorothy Whitelock remarks that "the influence of his sojourns in the north is seen in his terminology. While in general he writes a variety of late West Saxon literary language, he uses in some texts words of Scandinavian origin, especially in speaking of the various social classes." In some cases, Wulfstan is the only one known to have used a word in Old English, and in some cases such words are of Scandinavian origin. Some words of his that have been recognized as particularly Scandinavian are:
þræl "slave, servant" (cf. Old Norse þræll; cp. Old English þeowa) bonda "husband, householder" (cf. Old Norse bondi; cp. Old English ceorl) eorl "nobleman of high rank, (Danish) jarl" (cf. Old Norse jarl; cp. Old English ealdorman) fysan "to make someone ready, to put someone to flight" (cf. Old Norse fysa) genydmaga "close kinsfolk" (cf. Old Norse nauðleyti) laga "law" (cf. Old Norse lag; cp. Old English æw)
Some Old English words which appear only in works under his influence are:
werewulf "were-wolf" sibleger "incest" leohtgescot "light-scot" (a tithe to churches for candles) tofesian ægylde morðwyrhta
Read more about this topic: Wulfstan (died 1023)
Famous quotes containing the word language:
“I am both a public and a private school boy myself, having always changed schools just as the class in English in the new school was taking up Silas Marner, with the result that it was the only book in the English language that I knew until I was eighteen—but, boy, did I know Silas Marner!”
—Robert Benchley (1889–1945)
“Consensus is usually made possible by vague language and shallow commitments.”
—Mason Cooley (b. 1927)
“Our goal as a parent is to give life to our children’s learning—to instruct, to teach, to help them develop self-discipline—an ordering of the self from the inside, not imposition from the outside. Any technique that does not give life to a child’s learning and leave a child’s dignity intact cannot be called discipline—it is punishment, no matter what language it is clothed in.”
—Barbara Coloroso (20th century)