Media Capacity and Speed
Compared to tape recorders, wire recording devices had a high media speed, made necessary because of the use of the solid metal medium. Standard postwar wire recorders used a nominal speed of 24 inches per second (610 mm/s), making a typical one-hour spool of wire 7,200 feet (approx. 2200 m) long. This enormous length was possible on a spool less than 3 inches in diameter because the wire was nearly as fine as hair. 30 and 15 minute lengths of wire were also available on these small spools, which were employed by the majority of recorders made after 1945. Some heavy-duty recorders used the larger Armour spools, which could contain enough wire to record continuously for several hours. Because the wire was pulled past the head by the take-up spool, the actual wire speed slowly increased as the effective diameter of the take-up spool increased. Standardization prevented this peculiarity from having any impact on the playback of a spool recorded on a different machine, but audible consequences could result from substantially altering the original length of a recorded wire by excisions or by dividing it up onto multiple spools.
Read more about this topic: Wire Recording
Famous quotes containing the words media, capacity and/or speed:
“One can describe a landscape in many different words and sentences, but one would not normally cut up a picture of a landscape and rearrange it in different patterns in order to describe it in different ways. Because a photograph is not composed of discrete units strung out in a linear row of meaningful pieces, we do not understand it by looking at one element after another in a set sequence. The photograph is understood in one act of seeing; it is perceived in a gestalt.”
—Joshua Meyrowitz, U.S. educator, media critic. “The Blurring of Public and Private Behaviors,” No Sense of Place: The Impact of Electronic Media on Social Behavior, Oxford University Press (1985)
“Has the art of politics no apparent utility? Does it appear to be unqualifiedly ratty, raffish, sordid, obscene, and low down, and its salient virtuosi a gang of unmitigated scoundrels? Then let us not forget its high capacity to soothe and tickle the midriff, its incomparable services as a maker of entertainment.”
—H.L. (Henry Lewis)
“The correct rate of speed in innovating changes in long-standing social customs has not yet been determined by even the most expert of the experts. Personally I am beginning to think there is more danger in lagging than in speeding up cultural change to keep pace with mechanical change.”
—Mary Barnett Gilson (1877–?)