Important Page Links
- Wikipedia:Stub (WP:STUB) - official definition and instruction on stubs.
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Stub types (WP:WSS/ST) - lists all stub categories.
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Stub type sizes - gives numbers of members of all stub categories.
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals (WP:WSS/P) - for proposals on new stub types and other stub-related discussion.
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Discoveries (WP:WSS/D) - for newly-discovered stub types.
- Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion (WP:SFD) - for deletion, merging or renaming of stub templates and categories.
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Criteria/Archive - for archives of old proposals and discussions.
- Wikipedia:Most wanted stubs
- Special:Shortpages
- Category:Stub categories - the main list of stub categories and of articles contained within them
- Category:Stubs (CAT:STUB) - Articles tagged with generic {{stub}}. Frequently overpopulated and needs constant maintenance.
- Wikipedia:Database reports/Stubs included directly in stub categories
- Wikipedia:Database reports/Unused stub templates
Read more about this topic: Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub Sorting
Famous quotes containing the words important, page and/or links:
“The multiplication of individual sects should not fool us: the important point is that the whole of America is preoccupied with the sect as a moral institution, with its immediate demand for beatification, its material efficacity, its compulsion for justification, and doubtless also with its madness and frenzy.”
—Jean Baudrillard (b. 1929)
“If there is nothing new on the earth, still the traveler always has a resource in the skies. They are constantly turning a new page to view. The wind sets the types on this blue ground, and the inquiring may always read a new truth there.”
—Henry David Thoreau (18171862)
“The conclusion suggested by these arguments might be called the paradox of theorizing. It asserts that if the terms and the general principles of a scientific theory serve their purpose, i. e., if they establish the definite connections among observable phenomena, then they can be dispensed with since any chain of laws and interpretive statements establishing such a connection should then be replaceable by a law which directly links observational antecedents to observational consequents.”
—C.G. (Carl Gustav)