Volkswagen D24 Engine - Technical Description

Technical Description

All variants (naturally aspirated and forced induction) displace 2,383 cubic centimetres (145.4 cu in) from a cylinder bore of 76.48 millimetres (3.01 in), and a piston stroke of 86.4 millimetres (3.40 in). Its inline six cylinder block is constructed from grey cast iron, and has seven main bearings to support the die-forged steel crossplane crankshaft. The cast aluminium alloy cylinder head contains two valves per cylinder each with two concentric valve springs, and shim-adjustable bucket tappets. The valves are opened via a timing belt-driven single overhead camshaft (SOHC), and the combustion chamber compression ratio is 23.5:1.

Attached to the cylinder head is a cast aluminium alloy intake manifold on one side, and two cast iron exhaust manifolds on the same side (it's a non cross flow engine) (one manifold for three cylinders) followed by a two in one exhaust pipe system. The fuel system uses a Bosch mechanical distributor-type( bosch VE type) injection pump which feeds indirect fuel injection into a remote whirl pre-combustion chamber.

The initially available variant of the D24 produced a DIN-rated motive power output of 55 kilowatts (75 PS; 74 bhp) at 4,500 revolutions per minute (rpm); and it generated a torque turning force of 155 newton metres (114 lbf·ft) at 2,800 rpm. Subsequent minor evolutions and revisions resulted in differing power and torque ratings.

D24 models
ID(s) DIN-rated max. motive power
at rpm
max. torque
at rpm
redline
(rpm)
years
1S, ACT 51 kW (69 PS; 68 bhp) @ ?,??? 1988–1995
CP, DW 55 kW (75 PS; 74 bhp) @ 4,000 155 N·m (114 lbf·ft) @ 2,800 1978–1992
Volvo D24t 95 kW (129 PS; 127 bhp) @ 4,700 275 N·m (203 lbf·ft) @ 2,550 max rpm @5200 rpm before fuel cut

The weight of this engine is 182 kg or 401 lbs.

Read more about this topic:  Volkswagen D24 Engine

Famous quotes containing the words technical and/or description:

    I rather think the cinema will die. Look at the energy being exerted to revive it—yesterday it was color, today three dimensions. I don’t give it forty years more. Witness the decline of conversation. Only the Irish have remained incomparable conversationalists, maybe because technical progress has passed them by.
    Orson Welles (1915–1984)

    Why does philosophy use concepts and why does faith use symbols if both try to express the same ultimate? The answer, of course, is that the relation to the ultimate is not the same in each case. The philosophical relation is in principle a detached description of the basic structure in which the ultimate manifests itself. The relation of faith is in principle an involved expression of concern about the meaning of the ultimate for the faithful.
    Paul Tillich (1886–1965)