Later Conflicts
| Part of a series on the |
| History of Uruguay |
|---|
| Early History |
| Charrúa people |
| British invasions |
| Federal League |
| Cisplatina |
| Thirty-Three Orientals |
| Treaty of Montevideo |
| Independent State |
| Civil War |
| Paraguayan War |
| Revolution of the Lances |
| Battle of Masoller |
| 20th Century |
| Batllism |
| 1933 coup d'etat |
| Neo-Batllism |
| Military Regime |
| Tupamaros |
| 1973 coup d'etat |
| Civic-military dictatorship (1973-1985) |
| Modern Uruguay |
| Mercosur |
| Elections in Uruguay |
| Politics of Uruguay |
| Uruguay portal |
Both parties were weary of the chaos. In 1870, they came to an agreement to define spheres of influence: the Colorados would control Montevideo and the coastal region, the Blancos would rule the hinterland with its agricultural estates. In addition, the Blancos were paid half a million dollars to compensate them for the loss of their stake in Montevideo. But the caudillo mentality was difficult to erase from Uruguay and political feuding continued culminating in the Revolution of the Lances (Revolución de las Lanzas) (1870–1872), and later with the uprising of Aparicio Saravia, who was fatally injured at the Battle of Masoller (1904).
Read more about this topic: Uruguayan Civil War
Famous quotes containing the word conflicts:
“I would rather be the child of a mother who has all the inner conflicts of the human being than be mothered by someone for whom all is easy and smooth, who knows all the answers, and is a stranger to doubt.”
—D.W. Winnicott (20th century)
“The two most far-reaching critical theories at the beginning of the latest phase of industrial society were those of Marx and Freud. Marx showed the moving powers and the conflicts in the social-historical process. Freud aimed at the critical uncovering of the inner conflicts. Both worked for the liberation of man, even though Marx’s concept was more comprehensive and less time-bound than Freud’s.”
—Erich Fromm (1900–1980)