United States V. Arvizu - Scalia's Concurring Remarks

Scalia's Concurring Remarks

Scalia agreed that the Court was correct to reemphasize that the de novo standard of review applies to appellate review of rulings regarding reasonable suspicion. Even so, he criticized the Court's deference to a district judge's "factual inferences," finding it to be incompatible with de novo review.

Read more about this topic:  United States V. Arvizu

Famous quotes containing the word remarks:

    So, too, if, to our surprise, we should meet one of these morons whose remarks are so conspicuous a part of the folklore of the world of the radio—remarks made without using either the tongue or the brain, spouted much like the spoutings of small whales—we should recognize him as below the level of nature but not as below the level of the imagination.
    Wallace Stevens (1879–1955)