Unimodular Form - Symmetric, Skew-symmetric and Alternating Forms

Symmetric, Skew-symmetric and Alternating Forms

We define a form to be

  • symmetric if B(v, w) = B(w, v) for all v, w in V;
  • alternating if B(v, v) = 0 for all v in V;
  • skew-symmetric if B(v, w) = −B(w, v) for all v, w in V;

Proposition: Every alternating form is skew-symmetric. Proof: this can be seen by expanding B(v+w, v+w).

If the characteristic of F is not 2 then the converse is also true: every skew-symmetric form is alternating. If, however, char(F) = 2 then a skew-symmetric form is the same as a symmetric form and there exist symmetric/skew-symmetric forms which are not alternating.

A bilinear form is symmetric (resp. skew-symmetric) if and only if its coordinate matrix (relative to any basis) is symmetric (resp. skew-symmetric). A bilinear form is alternating if and only if its coordinate matrix is skew-symmetric and the diagonal entries are all zero (which follows from skew-symmetry when char(F) ≠ 2).

A bilinear form is symmetric if and only if the maps B1, B2: VV* are equal, and skew-symmetric if and only if they are negatives of one another. If char(F) ≠ 2 then one can decompose a bilinear form into a symmetric and a skew-symmetric part as follows

where B* is the transpose of B (defined above).

Also if char(F) ≠ 2 then one can define a quadratic form in terms of its associated symmetric form. One can likewise define quadratic forms corresponding to skew-symmetric forms, Hermitian forms, and skew-Hermitian forms; the general concept is ε-quadratic form.

Read more about this topic:  Unimodular Form

Famous quotes containing the word forms:

    We can imagine a society in which no one could survive as a social being because it does not correspond to biologically determined perceptions and human social needs. For historical reasons, existing societies might have such properties, leading to various forms of pathology.
    Noam Chomsky (b. 1928)