Two-stage Theory - Criticism

Criticism

Although the two stage theory is often attributed to Marx and Engels, critics such as David McLellan and others dispute that Marx and Engels envisaged the strict application of this theory outside of the actually existing Western development of capitalism.

There is no dispute that Marx and Engels argue that Western capitalism provides the technological advances necessary for socialism and the "grave diggers" of the capitalist class in the form of the working class. But critics of the two stage theory, including most trends of Trotskyism, argue that Marx and Engels denied that they had laid down a formula to be applied to all countries in all circumstances. McLellan and others cite Marx's Reply to Mikhailovsky. Mikhailovsky, Marx says,

In the Preface to the Russian edition of the Communist Manifesto of 1882, Marx and Engels specifically outline an alternative path to socialism for Russia.

In Russia, the Mensheviks believed the two stage theory applied to Tsarist Russia. They were criticised by Trotsky in what became the theory of Permanent Revolution in 1905. Later when the two stage theory re-appeared after the death of Lenin in the Soviet Union, the theory of Permanent Revolution was supported by the Left Opposition. The Permanent Revolution argues that the tasks allotted in the two stage theory to the capitalist class can only be carried out by the working class with the support of the poor peasantry, and that the working class will then pass on to the socialist tasks and expropriate the capitalist class. The revolution cannot pause here, however but remains 'permanent', in the sense that it must seek worldwide revolution to avoid isolation and thus move towards international socialism.