Relation With The Exponential Integral of Imaginary Argument
The function
is called the exponential integral. It is closely related to Si and Ci:
As each involved function is analytic except the cut at negative values of the argument, the area of validity of the relation should be extended to . (Out of this range, additional terms which are integer factors of appear in the expression).
Cases of imaginary argument of the generalized integro-exponential function are
which is the real part of
Similarly
Read more about this topic: Trigonometric Integral
Famous quotes containing the words relation with, relation, integral, imaginary and/or argument:
“There is undoubtedly something religious about it: everyone believes that they are special, that they are chosen, that they have a special relation with fate. Here is the test: you turn over card after card to see in which way that is true. If you can defy the odds, you may be saved. And when you are cleaned out, the last penny gone, you are enlightened at last, free perhaps, exhilarated like an ascetic by the falling away of the material world.”
—Andrei Codrescu (b. 1947)
“... a worker was seldom so much annoyed by what he got as by what he got in relation to his fellow workers.”
—Mary Barnett Gilson (1877?)
“Self-centeredness is a natural outgrowth of one of the toddlers major concerns: What is me and what is mine...? This is why most toddlers are incapable of sharing ... to a toddler, whats his is what he can get his hands on.... When something is taken away from him, he feels as though a piece of himan integral pieceis being torn from him.”
—Lawrence Balter (20th century)
“Avarice, the spur of industry, is so obstinate a passion, and works its way through so many real dangers and difficulties, that it is not likely to be scared by an imaginary danger, which is so small that it scarcely admits of calculation.”
—David Hume (17111776)
“English! they are barbarians; they dont believe in the great God. I told him, Excuse me, Sir. We do believe in God, and in Jesus Christ too. Um, says he, and in the Pope? No. And why? This was a puzzling question in these circumstances.... I thought I would try a method of my own, and very gravely replied, Because we are too far off. A very new argument against the universal infallibility of the Pope.”
—James Boswell (17401795)



![\int_1^\infty e^{iax}\frac{\ln x}{x^2}dx
=1+ia[-\frac{\pi^2}{24}+\gamma\left(\frac{\gamma}{2}+\ln a-1\right)+\frac{\ln^2 a}{2}-\ln a+1
-\frac{i\pi}{2}(\gamma+\ln a-1)]+\sum_{n\ge 1}\frac{(ia)^{n+1}}{(n+1)!n^2}.](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/a/e/d/aeded28afed65b67b55686229ace42ee.png)