Trigonometric Integral - Relation With The Exponential Integral of Imaginary Argument

Relation With The Exponential Integral of Imaginary Argument

The function

is called the exponential integral. It is closely related to Si and Ci:


{\rm E}_1( {\rm i}\!~ x) = i\left(-\frac{\pi}{2} + {\rm Si}(x)\right)-{\rm Ci}(x) = i~{\rm si}(x) - {\rm ci}(x) \qquad(x>0)

As each involved function is analytic except the cut at negative values of the argument, the area of validity of the relation should be extended to . (Out of this range, additional terms which are integer factors of appear in the expression).

Cases of imaginary argument of the generalized integro-exponential function are


\int_1^\infty \cos(ax)\frac{\ln x}{x} \, dx =
-\frac{\pi^2}{24}+\gamma\left(\frac{\gamma}{2}+\ln a\right)+\frac{\ln^2a}{2}
+\sum_{n\ge 1}\frac{(-a^2)^n}{(2n)!(2n)^2},

which is the real part of


\int_1^\infty e^{iax}\frac{\ln x}{x} \, dx = -\frac{\pi^2}{24} + \gamma\left(\frac{\gamma}{2}+\ln a\right)+\frac{\ln^2 a}{2}-\frac{\pi}{2}i(\gamma+\ln a) + \sum_{n\ge 1}\frac{(ia)^n}{n!n^2}.

Similarly


\int_1^\infty e^{iax}\frac{\ln x}{x^2}dx
=1+ia[-\frac{\pi^2}{24}+\gamma\left(\frac{\gamma}{2}+\ln a-1\right)+\frac{\ln^2 a}{2}-\ln a+1
-\frac{i\pi}{2}(\gamma+\ln a-1)]+\sum_{n\ge 1}\frac{(ia)^{n+1}}{(n+1)!n^2}.

Read more about this topic:  Trigonometric Integral

Famous quotes containing the words relation, integral, imaginary and/or argument:

    To criticize is to appreciate, to appropriate, to take intellectual possession, to establish in fine a relation with the criticized thing and to make it one’s own.
    Henry James (1843–1916)

    Make the most of your regrets; never smother your sorrow, but tend and cherish it till it come to have a separate and integral interest. To regret deeply is to live afresh.
    Henry David Thoreau (1817–1862)

    Where my imaginary line
    Bends square in woods, an iron spine
    And pile of real rocks have been founded.
    Robert Frost (1874–1963)

    Argument is conclusive ... but ... it does not remove doubt, so that the mind may rest in the sure knowledge of the truth, unless it finds it by the method of experiment.... For if any man who never saw fire proved by satisfactory arguments that fire burns ... his hearer’s mind would never be satisfied, nor would he avoid the fire until he put his hand in it ... that he might learn by experiment what argument taught.
    Roger Bacon (c. 1214–1294)