Legal Accuracy
Although the evidentiary law of the movie was accurate at the time the movie was produced, several evidentiary rules used in the movie have since been overturned by subsequent court rulings. Under California law during the events of the movie, the police did not have the authority to search garbage; this was overruled in California v. Greenwood, 486 U.S. 35 (1988), in which the United States Supreme Court ruled no reasonable expectation of privacy exists in a trashcan placed outside of a residence. Although the movie accurately reflects the law at the time it was released in 1983, Greenwood later invalidated that particular legal underpinning.
The evidentiary ruling by Hardin concerning the police officers' reliance upon Department of Motor Vehicles records that were out-of-date was also correct at the time of the movie's events but has since been overturned by the United States Supreme Court. In United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897 (1984), the Court carved out an exception to the exclusionary rule where a police officer relies on invalid information but does so in good faith. In Arizona v. Evans, 514 U.S. 1 (1995), the Court ruled that evidence seized as a result of incorrect motor vehicle records is still admissible.
Read more about this topic: The Star Chamber
Famous quotes containing the words legal and/or accuracy:
“... whilst you are proclaiming peace and good will to men, Emancipating all Nations, you insist upon retaining absolute power over wives. But you must remember that Arbitrary power is like most other things which are very hard, very liable to be broken—and notwithstanding all your wise Laws and Maxims we have it in our power not only to free ourselves but to subdue our Masters, and without violence throw both your natural and legal authority at our feet ...”
—Abigail Adams (1744–1818)
“U.S. international and security policy ... has as its primary goal the preservation of what we might call “the Fifth Freedom,” understood crudely but with a fair degree of accuracy as the freedom to rob, to exploit and to dominate, to undertake any course of action to ensure that existing privilege is protected and advanced.”
—Noam Chomsky (b. 1928)