The Newcastle Programme - The Failure To Implement The Newcastle Programme

The Failure To Implement The Newcastle Programme

The Liberal Party won the 1892 election, although its majority relied on Irish Nationalist support, and the results were far from the sort of endorsement from the electorate that Gladstone hoped. The new government was unable to enact much of the Newcastle Programme, even those parts of which Gladstone did approve, because of implacable opposition from the Conservative dominated House of Lords. According to one historian of the Liberal Party, the Conservative leader Lord Salisbury justified their rejection of the Liberal measures, including crucially Home Rules, on the basis that the Liberal victory in 1892 had rested on the votes of 150 electors in eight constituencies collected by offering many different policy bribes. Of the Newcastle Programme, the government's principal achievements were employers liability, parish councils and William Vernon Harcourt's 1894 budget, which introduced graduated death duties. Gladstone resigned as prime minister in 1894 and was replaced with Lord Rosebery who poured scorn on the Newcastle Programme as the 'flyblown phylacteries of obsolete policies'. When the government's efforts to bring in temperance reform and Welsh disestablishment also failed, Rosebery's disunited cabinet were almost anxious for an excuse to resign.

The Conservatives won the 1895 general election ushering in ten years of Tory government. The Radical policy inheritance of the Newcastle Programme would have to wait for the reforming governments of Henry Campbell-Bannerman and H. H. Asquith before being cashed in.

Read more about this topic:  The Newcastle Programme

Famous quotes containing the words failure and/or programme:

    What we’ve got here is failure to communicate.
    Donn Pearce, U.S. screenwriter, Frank R. Pierson, and Stuart Rosenberg. Captain (Strother Martin)

    The idealist’s programme of political or economic reform may be impracticable, absurd, demonstrably ridiculous; but it can never be successfully opposed merely by pointing out that this is the case. A negative opposition cannot be wholly effectual: there must be a competing idealism; something must be offered that is not only less objectionable but more desirable.
    Charles Horton Cooley (1864–1929)