Weekly Results
| Elimination chart | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Candidate | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Lee | IN | IN | IN | IN | IN | IN | WIN | IN | IN | WIN | IN | HIRED |
| Claire | WIN | IN | IN | BR | WIN | BR | BR | IN | BR | BR | IN | FIRED |
| Alex | LOSE | IN | IN | BR | IN | IN | BR | IN | WIN | IN | IN | FIRED |
| Helene | IN | IN | IN | WIN | IN | IN | IN | LOSE | IN | BR | IN | FIRED |
| Lucinda | IN | BR | IN | IN | LOSE | IN | IN | WIN | IN | IN | FIRED | |
| Michael | IN | IN | IN | IN | IN | WIN | BR | BR | BR | FIRED | ||
| Raef | BR | WIN | IN | IN | IN | IN | IN | IN | FIRED | |||
| Sara | IN | IN | WIN | IN | IN | BR | IN | FIRED | ||||
| Jennifer | IN | IN | IN | IN | BR | IN | FIRED | |||||
| Jenny | IN | LOSE | IN | IN | IN | IN | FIRED | |||||
| Kevin | IN | IN | BR | IN | IN | FIRED | ||||||
| Lindi | IN | IN | IN | IN | FIRED | |||||||
| Simon | IN | IN | BR | FIRED | ||||||||
| Ian | IN | IN | FIRED | |||||||||
| Shazia | IN | FIRED | ||||||||||
| Nicholas | FIRED | |||||||||||
- The candidate was on the winning team (or, in Week 11, managed to avoid being fired.)
- The candidate was on the losing team.
- The candidate was hired and won The Apprentice.
- The candidate was the runner-up.
- The candidate won as project manager on his/her team.
- The candidate lost as project manager on his/her team.
- The candidate was brought to the final boardroom.
- The candidate was fired.
- The candidate lost as project manager and was fired.
Read more about this topic: The Apprentice (UK Series Four)
Famous quotes containing the words weekly and/or results:
“Henry David Thoreau, who never earned much of a living or sustained a relationship with any woman that wasn’t brotherly—who lived mostly under his parents’ roof ... who advocated one day’s work and six days “off” as the weekly round and was considered a bit of a fool in his hometown ... is probably the American writer who tells us best how to live comfortably with our most constant companion, ourselves.”
—Edward Hoagland (b. 1932)
““The ideal reasoner,” he remarked, “would, when he had once been shown a single fact in all its bearings, deduce from it not only all the chain of events which led up to it but also all the results which would follow from it.””
—Sir Arthur Conan Doyle (1859–1930)