Tent Map - Behaviour

Behaviour

The tent map and the logistic map are topologically conjugate, and thus the behaviours of the two maps are in this sense identical under iteration.

Depending on the value of μ, the tent map demonstrates a range of dynamical behaviour ranging from predictable to chaotic.

  • If μ is less than 1 the point x = 0 is an attractive fixed point of the system for all initial values of x i.e. the system will converge towards x = 0 from any initial value of x.
  • If μ is 1 all values of x less than or equal to 1/2 are fixed points of the system.
  • If μ is greater than 1 the system has two fixed points, one at 0, and the other at μ/(μ + 1). Both fixed points are unstable i.e. a value of x close to either fixed point will move away from it, rather than towards it. For example, when μ is 1.5 there is a fixed point at x = 0.6 (because 1.5(1 − 0.6) = 0.6) but starting at x = 0.61 we get
  • If μ is between 1 and the square root of 2 the system maps a set of intervals between μ − μ2/2 and μ/2 to themselves. This set of intervals is the Julia set of the map i.e. it is the smallest invariant sub-set of the real line under this map. If μ is greater than the square root of 2, these intervals merge, and the Julia set is the whole interval from μ − μ2/2 to μ/2 (see bifurcation diagram).
  • If μ is between 1 and 2 the interval contains both periodic and non-periodic points, although all of the orbits are unstable (i.e. nearby points move away from the orbits rather than towards them). Orbits with longer lengths appear as μ increases. For example:
  • If μ equals 2 the system maps the interval onto itself. There are now periodic points with every orbit length within this interval, as well as non-periodic points. The periodic points are dense in, so the map has become chaotic. In fact, the dynamics will be non-periodic if and only if is irrational. This can be seen by noting what the map does when is expressed in binary notation: It shifts the binary point one place to the right; then, if what appears to the left of the binary point is a "one" it changes all ones to zeroes and vice versa (with the exception of the final bit "one" in the case of a finite binary expansion); starting from an irrational number, this process goes on forever without repeating itself. The invariant measure for x is the uniform density over the unit interval. The autocorrelation function for a sufficiently long sequence {} will show zero autocorrelation at all non-zero lags. Thus cannot be distinguished from white noise using the autocorrelation function. Note that the r=4 case of the logistic map and the case of the tent map are transformations of each other: Denoting the logistically evolving variable as, we have .
  • If μ is greater than 2 the map's Julia set becomes disconnected, and breaks up into a Cantor set within the interval . The Julia set still contains an infinite number of both non-periodic and periodic points (including orbits for any orbit length) but almost every point within will now eventually diverge towards infinity. The canonical Cantor set (obtained by successively deleting middle thirds from subsets of the unit line) is the Julia set of the tent map for μ = 3.

Read more about this topic:  Tent Map

Famous quotes containing the word behaviour:

    I cannot be much pleased without an appearance of truth; at least of possibility—I wish the history to be natural though the sentiments are refined; and the characters to be probable, though their behaviour is excelling.
    Frances Burney (1752–1840)

    The methodological advice to interpret in a way that optimizes agreement should not be conceived as resting on a charitable assumption about human intelligence that might turn out to be false. If we cannot find a way to interpret the utterances and other behaviour of a creature as revealing a set of beliefs largely consistent and true by our standards, we have no reason to count that creature as rational, as having beliefs, or as saying anything.
    Donald Davidson (b. 1917)

    When we read of human beings behaving in certain ways, with the approval of the author, who gives his benediction to this behaviour by his attitude towards the result of the behaviour arranged by himself, we can be influenced towards behaving in the same way.
    —T.S. (Thomas Stearns)