Stirling's Theorem - A Convergent Version of Stirling's Formula

A Convergent Version of Stirling's Formula

Thomas Bayes showed, in a letter to John Canton published by the Royal Society in 1763, that Stirling's formula did not give a convergent series.

Obtaining a convergent version of Stirling's formula entails evaluating

One way to do this is by means of a convergent series of inverted rising exponentials. If

then

where

where s(n, k) denotes the Stirling numbers of the first kind. From this we obtain a version of Stirling's series

\begin{align} \ln(\Gamma (z)) & = \left( z-\tfrac{1}{2}\right) \ln(z) -z + \tfrac{1}{2}\ln(2 \pi) + \frac{1}{12(z+1)} + \frac{1}{12(z+1)(z+2)} + \\ & \qquad \qquad + \frac{59}{360(z+1)(z+2)(z+3)} + \frac{29}{60(z+1)(z+2)(z+3)(z+4)} + \cdots \end{align}

which converges when Re(z) > 0.

Read more about this topic:  Stirling's Theorem

Famous quotes containing the words version, stirling and/or formula:

    “If the only new thing we have to offer is an improved version of the past, then today can only be inferior to yesterday. Hypnotised by images of the past, we risk losing all capacity for creative change.”
    —Robert Hewison (b. 1943)

    “Oh, if thy pride did not our joys control,
    What world of loving wonders shouldst thou see!
    For if I saw thee once transformed in me,
    Then in thy bosom I would pour my soul;”
    —William Alexander, Earl O Stirling (1580?–1640)

    “Beauty, like all other qualities presented to human experience, is relative; and the definition of it becomes unmeaning and useless in proportion to its abstractness. To define beauty not in the most abstract, but in the most concrete terms possible, not to find a universal formula for it, but the formula which expresses most adequately this or that special manifestation of it, is the aim of the true student of aesthetics.”
    —Walter Pater (1839–1894)