Spherical Multipole Moments - Interaction Energies of Spherical Multipoles

Interaction Energies of Spherical Multipoles

A simple formula for the interaction energy of two non-overlapping but concentric charge distributions can be derived. Let the first charge distribution be centered on the origin and lie entirely within the second charge distribution . The interaction energy between any two static charge distributions is defined by

U \ \stackrel{\mathrm{def}}{=}\ \int d\mathbf{r} \rho_{2}(\mathbf{r}) \Phi_{1}(\mathbf{r})

The potential of the first (central) charge distribution may be expanded in exterior multipoles

\Phi(\mathbf{r}) = \frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon} \sum_{l=0}^{\infty} \sum_{m=-l}^{l} Q_{1lm} \left( \frac{1}{r^{l+1}} \right) \sqrt{\frac{4\pi}{2l+1}} Y_{lm}(\theta, \phi)

where represents the exterior multipole moment of the first charge distribution. Substitution of this expansion yields the formula

U = \frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon} \sum_{l=0}^{\infty} \sum_{m=-l}^{l} Q_{1lm} \int d\mathbf{r} \ \rho_{2}(\mathbf{r}) \left( \frac{1}{r^{l+1}} \right) \sqrt{\frac{4\pi}{2l+1}} Y_{lm}(\theta, \phi)

Since the integral equals the complex conjugate of the interior multipole moments of the second (peripheral) charge distribution, the energy formula reduces to the simple form

U = \frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon} \sum_{l=0}^{\infty} \sum_{m=-l}^{l} Q_{1lm} I_{2lm}^{*}

For example, this formula may be used to determine the electrostatic interaction energies of the atomic nucleus with its surrounding electronic orbitals. Conversely, given the interaction energies and the interior multipole moments of the electronic orbitals, one may find the exterior multipole moments (and, hence, shape) of the atomic nucleus.

Read more about this topic:  Spherical Multipole Moments

Famous quotes containing the words interaction and/or energies:

    “Recent studies that have investigated maternal satisfaction have found this to be a better prediction of mother-child interaction than work status alone. More important for the overall quality of interaction with their children than simply whether the mother works or not, these studies suggest, is how satisfied the mother is with her role as worker or homemaker. Satisfied women are consistently more warm, involved, playful, stimulating and effective with their children than unsatisfied women.”
    —Alison Clarke-Stewart (20th century)

    “... no one who has not been an integral part of a slaveholding community, can have any idea of its abominations.... even were slavery no curse to its victims, the exercise of arbitrary power works such fearful ruin upon the hearts of slaveholders, that I should feel impelled to labor and pray for its overthrow with my last energies and latest breath.”
    —Angelina Grimké (1805–1879)