Singular Solution - Failure of Uniqueness

Failure of Uniqueness

Consider the differential equation

A one-parameter family of solutions to this equation is given by

Another solution is given by

Since the equation being studied is a first-order equation, the initial conditions are the initial x and y values. By considering the two sets of solutions above, one can see that the solution fails to be unique when . (It can be shown that for, if a single branch of the square root is chosen, then there is a local solution which is unique using the Picard–Lindelöf theorem.) Thus, the solutions above are all singular solutions, in the sense that solution fails to be unique in a neighbourhood of one or more points. (Commonly, we say "uniqueness fails" at these points.) For the first set of solutions, uniqueness fails at one point, and for the second solution, uniqueness fails at every value of . Thus, the solution is a singular solution in the stronger sense that uniqueness fails at every value of x. However, it is not a singular function since it and all its derivatives are continuous.

In this example, the solution is the envelope of the family of solutions . The solution is tangent to every curve at the point .

The failure of uniqueness can be used to construct more solutions. These can be found by taking two constant and defining a solution to be when, to be when, and to be when . Direct calculation shows that this is a solution of the differential equation at every point, including and . Uniqueness fails for these solutions on the interval, and the solutions are singular, in the sense that the second derivative fails to exist, at and .

Read more about this topic:  Singular Solution

Famous quotes containing the words failure of, failure and/or uniqueness:

    Government is actually the worst failure of civilized man. There has never been a really good one, and even those that are most tolerable are arbitrary, cruel, grasping and unintelligent.
    —H.L. (Henry Lewis)

    ... the first reason for psychology’s failure to understand what people are and how they act, is that clinicians and psychiatrists, who are generally the theoreticians on these matters, have essentially made up myths without any evidence to support them; the second reason for psychology’s failure is that personality theory has looked for inner traits when it should have been looking for social context.
    Naomi Weisstein (b. 1939)

    Until now when we have started to talk about the uniqueness of America we have almost always ended by comparing ourselves to Europe. Toward her we have felt all the attraction and repulsions of Oedipus.
    Daniel J. Boorstin (b. 1914)