Sibilant - Possible Combinations

Possible Combinations

The attested possibilities, with exemplar languages, are as follows. Note that the IPA diacritics are simplified; some articulations would require two diacritics to be fully specified, but only one is used in order to keep the results legible without the need for OpenType IPA fonts. Also, Ladefoged has resurrected an obsolete IPA symbol, the under dot, to indicate apical postalveolar (normally included in the category of retroflex consonants), and that notation is used here. (Note that the notation s̠, ṣ is sometimes reversed; either may also be called 'retroflex' and written ʂ.)

IPA Tongue shape Place of articulation (mouth) Place of articulation (tongue) Exemplifying languages
hollow dental apical southeast European Spanish s/z, Kumeyaay
hollow denti-alveolar laminal Polish s, z; Basque z, tz
hollow alveolar apical northern peninsular Spanish s; Basque s, ts; Mandarin s, z, c (apical, dental or alveolar)
hollow alveolar apical or laminal English s, z (alveolar, laminal or apical); American or southwest European Spanish s/z
hollow alveolar laminal Toda, Ubykh, Abkhaz
domed postalveolar apical or laminal English sh, ch, j, zh and French ch, j
domed postalveolar laminal Toda; Basque x, tx
palatalized postalveolar laminal Mandarin x, j, q; Polish ć, ś, ź, dź; Ubykh; Abkhaz
(ad hoc transcription) hollow
(no cavity)
postalveolar laminal Ubykh; Abkhaz
, hollow or flat
(cavity under tongue)
postalveolar laminal Polish sz, rz, cz, dż ; Mandarin sh, zh, ch
, etc.1 hollow postalveolar apical Ubykh; Abkhaz; Kumeyaay; Toda
curled palatal (or postalveolar?) subapical Toda

^1 These sounds are usually just transcribed . Apical postalveolar and subapical palatal sibilants do not contrast in any language, but if necessary, apical postalveolar can be transcribed with an apical diacritic, as or .

Read more about this topic:  Sibilant

Famous quotes containing the word combinations:

    What is the structure of government that will best guard against the precipitate counsels and factious combinations for unjust purposes, without a sacrifice of the fundamental principle of republicanism?
    James Madison (1751–1836)

    One way to think about play, is as the process of finding new combinations for known things—combinations that may yield new forms of expression, new inventions, new discoveries, and new solutions....It’s exactly what children’s play seems to be about and explains why so many people have come to think that children’s play is so important a part of childhood—and beyond.
    Fred Rogers (20th century)