Seventeen or Bust - Prime Number Discoveries

Prime Number Discoveries

The Seventeen or Bust set, with data for the eleven prime numbers eliminated to date:

# k n Digits of k·2n+1 Date of discovery Found by
1 4,847 3,321,063 999,744 15 Oct 2005 Richard Hassler
2 5,359 5,054,502 1,521,561 06 Dec 2003 Randy Sundquist
3 10,223 > 17,000,000 (Search in progress)
4 19,249 13,018,586 3,918,990 26 Mar 2007 Konstantin Agafonov
5 21,181 > 17,000,000 (Search in progress)
6 22,699 > 17,000,000 (Search in progress)
7 24,737 > 17,000,000 (Search in progress)
8 27,653 9,167,433 2,759,677 08 Jun 2005 Derek Gordon
9 28,433 7,830,457 2,357,207 30 Dec 2004 Anonymous
10 33,661 7,031,232 2,116,617 13 Oct 2007 Sturle Sunde
11 44,131 995,972 299,823 06 Dec 2002 deviced (nickname)
12 46,157 698,207 210,186 26 Nov 2002 Stephen Gibson
13 54,767 1,337,287 402,569 22 Dec 2002 Peter Coels
14 55,459 > 17,000,000 (Search in progress)
15 65,567 1,013,803 305,190 03 Dec 2002 James Burt
16 67,607 > 17,000,000 (Search in progress)
17 69,109 1,157,446 348,431 07 Dec 2002 Sean DiMichele

As of December 2011 the largest of these primes, 19249·213018586+1, is the largest known prime number that is not a Mersenne prime.

Note that each of these numbers has enough digits to fill up a medium-sized novel, at least. The project is presently dividing numbers among its active users, in hope of finding a prime number in each of the six remaining sequences:

k·2n+1, for k = 10223, 21181, 22699, 24737, 55459, 67607.

Read more about this topic:  Seventeen Or Bust

Famous quotes containing the words prime, number and/or discoveries:

    “The prime lesson the social sciences can learn from the natural sciences is just this: that it is necessary to press on to find the positive conditions under which desired events take place, and that these can be just as scientifically investigated as can instances of negative correlation. This problem is beyond relativity.”
    —Ruth Benedict (1887–1948)

    “Without claiming superiority of intellectual over visual understanding, one is nevertheless bound to admit that the cinema allows a number of æsthetic-intellectual means of perception to remain unexercised which cannot but lead to a weakening of judgment.”
    —Johan Huizinga (1872–1945)

    “One of the most horrible, yet most important, discoveries of our age has been that, if you really wish to destroy a person and turn him into an automaton, the surest method is not physical torture, in the strict sense, but simply to keep him awake, i.e., in an existential relation to life without intermission.”
    —W.H. (Wystan Hugh)