Separable State - Separable Pure States

Separable Pure States

For simplicity, the following assumes all relevant state spaces are finite dimensional. First, consider separability for pure states.

Let and be quantum mechanical state spaces, that is, finite dimensional Hilbert spaces with basis states and, respectively. By a postulate of quantum mechanics, the state space of the composite system is given by the tensor product

with base states, or in more compact notation . From the very definition of the tensor product, any vector of norm 1, i.e. a pure state of the composite system, can be written as

|\psi\rangle = \Sigma_{i,j} c_{i,j} | a_i \rangle \otimes | b_j \rangle =\Sigma_{i,j} c_{i,j} | a_i b_j \rangle

If a pure state can be written in the form where is a pure state of the i-th subsystem, it is said to be separable. Otherwise it is called entangled. Formally, the embedding of a product of states into the product space is given by the Segre embedding. That is, a quantum-mechanical pure state is separable if and only if it is in the image of the Segre embedding.

A standard example of an (un-normalized) entangled state is

|\psi\rangle = \begin{bmatrix} 1 \\ 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{bmatrix} \in H \otimes H

where H is the Hilbert space of dimension 2. We see that when a system is in an entangled pure state, it is not possible to assign states to its subsystems. This will be true, in the appropriate sense, for the mixed state case as well.

The above discussion can be extended to the case of when the state space is infinite dimensional with virtually nothing changed.

Read more about this topic:  Separable State

Famous quotes containing the words pure and/or states:

    “But all its chief delight was still
    On Roses thus its self to fill:
    And its pure virgin Limbs to fold
    In whitest sheets of Lillies cold.
    Had it liv’d long it would have been
    Lillies without, Roses within.”
    —Andrew Marvell (1621–1678)

    “I do seriously believe that if we can measure among the States the benefits resulting from the preservation of the Union, the rebellious States have the larger share. It destroyed an institution that was their destruction. It opened the way for a commercial life that, if they will only embrace it and face the light, means to them a development that shall rival the best attainments of the greatest of our States.”
    —Benjamin Harrison (1833–1901)