Science Bowl - Results of The National Competition

Results of The National Competition

The top four teams (out of 69) at the 2012 National Science Bowl were

  1. Lexington High School (Lexington, Massachusetts)
  2. North Hollywood High School (North Hollywood, California)
  3. Mira Loma High School (Sacramento, California)
  4. Morgantown High School (Morgantown, West Virginia)

The top four teams (out of 69) at the 2011 National Science Bowl were

  1. Mira Loma High School (Sacramento, California)
  2. Montgomery Blair High School (Silver Spring, Maryland)
  3. Sunset High School (Portland, Oregon)
  4. Hunter College High School (New York City)

The top four teams (out of 68) at the 2010 National Science Bowl were

  1. North Carolina School of Science and Mathematics (Durham, North Carolina)
  2. Mira Loma High School (Sacramento, California)
  3. North Hollywood High School (North Hollywood, California)
  4. Arcadia High School (Arcadia, California)

The top four teams (out of 67) at the 2009 National Science Bowl were

  1. Mira Loma High School (Sacramento, California)
  2. Lexington High School (Lexington, Massachusetts)
  3. Oak Ridge High School (Oak Ridge, Tennessee)
  4. Santa Monica High School (Santa Monica, California)

The full double elimination bracket for the 2009 tournament is shown below:

The top four teams (out of 67) at the 2008 National Science Bowl were

  1. Santa Monica High School (Santa Monica, California)
  2. Mira Loma High School (Sacramento, California)
  3. Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology (Alexandria, Virginia)
  4. Fairview High School (Boulder, Colorado)

The top four teams (out of 64) at the 2007 National Science Bowl were

  1. Poudre High School (Fort Collins, Colorado)
  2. State College Area High School (State College, Pennsylvania)
  3. East Chapel Hill High School (Chapel Hill, North Carolina)
  4. Miami Palmetto Senior High School (Pinecrest, Florida)

The top four teams (out of 65) at the 2006 National Science Bowl were

  1. State College Area High School (State College, Pennsylvania)
  2. North Hollywood High School (North Hollywood, California)
  3. Santa Monica High School (Santa Monica, California)
  4. Albany High School (Albany, California)

The top five teams (out of 63) at the 2005 National Science Bowl were

  1. Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology (Alexandria, Virginia)
  2. Mission San Jose High School (Fremont, California)
  3. George Walton Comprehensive High School (Marietta, Georgia)
  4. Miami Palmetto Senior High School (Pinecrest, Florida)
  5. Thomas S. Wootton High School (Rockville, Maryland)

The top five teams (out of 64) at the 2004 National Science Bowl were

  1. Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology (Alexandria, Virginia)
  2. A&M Consolidated High School (College Station, Texas)
  3. Baton Rouge Magnet High School (Baton Rouge, Louisiana)
  4. Montgomery Blair High School (Silver Spring, Maryland)
  5. North Hollywood High School (North Hollywood, California)

The full double elimination bracket from the 2004 competition is shown below. The bracket was unseeded (as in most years), i.e. positions in the draw were chosen randomly among qualifying teams. Red numbers are not seed numbers, but match numbers to be used for reference in the bottom half of the bracket (the loser's bracket).

The top five teams (out of 66) at the 2003 National Science Bowl were

  1. Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology (Alexandria, Virginia)
  2. Centerville High School (Centerville, Ohio)
  3. A&M Consolidated High School (College Station, Texas)
  4. Taylor Allderdice High School (Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania)
  5. Cincinnati Country Day School (Cincinnati, Ohio)

The full double elimination bracket from the 2003 competition is shown below. The bracket was unseeded (as in most years), i.e. positions in the draw were chosen randomly among qualifying teams. Red numbers are not seed numbers, but match numbers to be used for reference in the bottom half of the bracket (the loser's bracket).

The top five teams (out of 64) at the 2002 National Science Bowl were

  1. Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology (Alexandria, Virginia)
  2. Boulder High School (Boulder, Colorado)
  3. Mission San Jose High School (Fremont, California) (note: this is the correct spelling of Fremont. The NSB website gives "Freemont".)
  4. Sycamore High School (Cincinnati, Ohio)
  5. Hanford High School (Richland, Washington)

The winning teams from the years 1991-2001 (number of teams participating in parentheses):

  • 2001 (61 teams) North Hollywood High School (North Hollywood, California)
  • 2000 (60 teams) duPont Manual High School (Louisville, Kentucky)
  • 1999 (53 teams) Montgomery Blair High School (Silver Spring, Maryland)
  • 1998 (48 teams) Valley High School (West Des Moines, Iowa)
  • 1997 (45 teams) Venice High School (Los Angeles)
  • 1996 (53 teams) Venice High School (Los Angeles)
  • 1995 (55 teams) Van Nuys High School (Van Nuys, California)
  • 1994 (51 teams) Westminster School (Atlanta, Georgia)
  • 1993 (43 teams) Albany High School (Albany, California)
  • 1992 (29 teams) Lubbock High School (Lubbock, Texas)
  • 1991 (18 teams) Lubbock High School (Lubbock, Texas)

Read more about this topic:  Science Bowl

Famous quotes containing the words results of the, results of, results, national and/or competition:

    It is perhaps the principal admirableness of the Gothic schools of architecture, that they receive the results of the labour of inferior minds; and out of fragments full of imperfection ... raise up a stately and unaccusable whole.
    John Ruskin (1819–1900)

    It is perhaps the principal admirableness of the Gothic schools of architecture, that they receive the results of the labour of inferior minds; and out of fragments full of imperfection ... raise up a stately and unaccusable whole.
    John Ruskin (1819–1900)

    There is ... in every child a painstaking teacher, so skilful that he obtains identical results in all children in all parts of the world. The only language men ever speak perfectly is the one they learn in babyhood, when no one can teach them anything!
    Maria Montessori (1870–1952)

    We love the indomitable bellicose patriotism that sets you apart; we love the national pride that guides your muscularly courageous race; we love the potent individualism that doesn’t prevent you from opening your arms to individualists of every land, whether libertarians or anarchists.
    Tommaso Marinetti (1876–1944)

    Knowledge in the form of an informational commodity indispensable to productive power is already, and will continue to be, a major—perhaps the major—stake in the worldwide competition for power. It is conceivable that the nation-states will one day fight for control of information, just as they battled in the past for control over territory, and afterwards for control over access to and exploitation of raw materials and cheap labor.
    Jean François Lyotard (b. 1924)