Schur Polynomial - Definition

Definition

Schur polynomials correspond to integer partitions. Given a partition

(where each dj is a non-negative integer), the following functions are alternating polynomials (in other words they change sign under any transposition of the variables):

 a_{(d_1+n-1, d_2+n-2, \dots, d_n)} (x_1, x_2, \dots, x_n) =
\det \left[ \begin{matrix} x_1^{d_1+n-1} & x_2^{d_1+n-1} & \dots & x_n^{d_1+n-1} \\
x_1^{d_2+n-2} & x_2^{d_2+n-2} & \dots & x_n^{d_2+n-2} \\
\vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\
x_1^{d_n} & x_2^{d_n} & \dots & x_n^{d_n} \end{matrix} \right]

Since they are alternating, they are all divisible by the Vandermonde determinant:

 a_{(n-1, n-2, \dots, 0)} (x_1, x_2, \dots, x_n) = \det \left[ \begin{matrix} x_1^{n-1} & x_2^{n-1} & \dots & x_n^{n-1} \\
x_1^{n-2} & x_2^{n-2} & \dots & x_n^{n-2} \\
\vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\
1 & 1 & \dots & 1 \end{matrix} \right] = \prod_{1 \leq j < k \leq n} (x_j-x_k).

The Schur polynomials are defined as the ratio:

 s_{(d_1, d_2, \dots, d_n)} (x_1, x_2, \dots, x_n) =
\frac{ a_{(d_1+n-1, d_2+n-2, \dots, d_n+0)} (x_1, x_2, \dots, x_n)}
{a_{(n-1, n-2, \dots, 0)} (x_1, x_2, \dots, x_n) }.

This is a symmetric function because the numerator and denominator are both alternating, and a polynomial since all alternating polynomials are divisible by the Vandermonde determinant.

Read more about this topic:  Schur Polynomial

Famous quotes containing the word definition:

    Beauty, like all other qualities presented to human experience, is relative; and the definition of it becomes unmeaning and useless in proportion to its abstractness. To define beauty not in the most abstract, but in the most concrete terms possible, not to find a universal formula for it, but the formula which expresses most adequately this or that special manifestation of it, is the aim of the true student of aesthetics.
    Walter Pater (1839–1894)

    It’s a rare parent who can see his or her child clearly and objectively. At a school board meeting I attended . . . the only definition of a gifted child on which everyone in the audience could agree was “mine.”
    Jane Adams (20th century)

    The man who knows governments most completely is he who troubles himself least about a definition which shall give their essence. Enjoying an intimate acquaintance with all their particularities in turn, he would naturally regard an abstract conception in which these were unified as a thing more misleading than enlightening.
    William James (1842–1910)