Salem's Lot (radio Drama) - Differences Between The Novel and Radio Adaptation

Differences Between The Novel and Radio Adaptation

Although the story's overall structure remains similar, several lines have been consolidated and/or simplified, in keeping with the much-shortened radio format (seven 30-minute broadcasts).

  • Ralphie Glick's role is reduced
  • Dud Rogers and the junkyard see only cursory mention (much of the Barlow/Dud Rogers dialogue having been rescripted into the Barlow/Larry Crockett death scene)
  • Danny Glick's rise from the grave (and the death of Mike Ryerson) are now enabled/supervised by Barlow, who mesmerizes Ryerson and calls Danny forth
  • Father Callahan and Dr. Cody become quick/willing vampire-hunters, with virtually no complaint or skepticism
  • Mark Petrie uses shards of broken glass (rather than contortionist rope-tricks) to free himself from Straker's knots
  • The entire narrative is framed by Ben Mears' confession to a Mexican priest (who periodically interrupts the retelling with specific questions)
Stephen King's 'Salem's Lot
Characters
  • Kurt Barlow
  • Father Callahan
  • Vampires
Adaptations
  • Salem's Lot (1979 TV miniseries)
  • Salem's Lot (1995 radio drama) –
  • Salem's Lot (2004 TV miniseries)
Series
  • "Jerusalem's Lot" (prequel)
  • One for the Road (sequel)
Related
  • A Return to Salem's Lot (1987) – in-name only sequel to 1979 miniseries
  • Jerusalem's Lot
  • The Dark Tower series
    • related works

Read more about this topic:  Salem's Lot (radio Drama)

Famous quotes containing the words differences between the, differences between, differences, radio and/or adaptation:

    What strikes many twin researchers now is not how much identical twins are alike, but rather how different they are, given the same genetic makeup....Multiples don’t walk around in lockstep, talking in unison, thinking identical thoughts. The bond for normal twins, whether they are identical or fraternal, is based on how they, as individuals who are keenly aware of the differences between them, learn to relate to one another.
    Pamela Patrick Novotny (20th century)

    The mother must teach her son how to respect and follow the rules. She must teach him how to compete successfully with the other boys. And she must teach him how to find a woman to take care of him and finish the job she began of training him how to live in a family. But no matter how good a job a woman does in teaching a boy how to be a man, he knows that she is not the real thing, and so he tends to exaggerate the differences between men and women that she embodies.
    Frank Pittman (20th century)

    Quintilian [educational writer in Rome about A.D. 100] hoped that teachers would be sensitive to individual differences of temperament and ability. . . . Beating, he thought, was usually unnecessary. A teacher who had made the effort to understand his pupil’s individual needs and character could probably dispense with it: “I will content myself with saying that children are helpless and easily victimized, and that therefore no one should be given unlimited power over them.”
    C. John Sommerville (20th century)

    Denouement to denouement, he took a personal pride in the
    certain, certain way he lived his own, private life,
    but nevertheless, they shut off his gas; nevertheless,
    the bank foreclosed; nevertheless, the landlord called;
    nevertheless, the radio broke,

    And twelve o’clock arrived just once too often,
    Kenneth Fearing (1902–1961)

    In youth the human body drew me and was the object of my secret and natural dreams. But body after body has taken away from me that sensual phosphorescence which my youth delighted in. Within me is no disturbing interplay now, but only the steady currents of adaptation and of sympathy.
    Haniel Long (1888–1956)