Rumble Fish - Differences From The Novel

Differences From The Novel

Coppola did not employ the flashback structure of the novel. He also removed a few passages from the novel that further established Steve and Rusty James' relationship in order to focus more on the brothers' relationship.

  • The Motorcycle Boy's self-destructive actions at the film's conclusion are less motivated in the film than in the novel. In the film, the Motorcycle Boy is more attendant and more paternalistic toward Rusty James than in the novel.
  • The film ends with the younger brother arriving at the ocean on a motorcycle while the novel ends with Steve meeting Rusty James in California five years after Motorcycle Boy's death.
  • Furthermore, Rusty James got arrested after Motorcycle Boy had been shot and never made the promise to ride the motorcycle.
  • During the fight with Biff, Rusty James was slashed with a knife rather than a pane of glass and Motorcycle Boy simply broke Biff's wrist instead of ramming him with his motorcycle.
  • Finally, Rusty James used a bike chain to disarm Biff, whereas in the film he uses a sweater.

Read more about this topic:  Rumble Fish

Famous quotes containing the words the novel and/or differences:

    Whatever is felt upon the page without being specifically named there—that, one might say, is created. It is the inexplicable presence of the thing not named, of the overtone divined by the ear but not heard by it, the verbal mood, the emotional aura of the fact or the thing or the deed, that gives high quality to the novel or the drama, as well as to poetry itself.
    Willa Cather (1873–1947)

    Quintilian [educational writer in Rome about A.D. 100] hoped that teachers would be sensitive to individual differences of temperament and ability. . . . Beating, he thought, was usually unnecessary. A teacher who had made the effort to understand his pupil’s individual needs and character could probably dispense with it: “I will content myself with saying that children are helpless and easily victimized, and that therefore no one should be given unlimited power over them.”
    C. John Sommerville (20th century)